Devocht Elke M J, Janssen A Miranda L, Chalupper Josef, Stokroos Robert J, George Erwin L J
Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Methodology and Statistics, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160829. eCollection 2016.
To evaluate monaural beamforming in bimodally aided cochlear implant (CI) users.
The study enrolled twelve adult bimodal listeners with at least six months of CI-experience and using a contralateral hearing aid (HA) most of the daytime. Participants were uniformly fitted with the same CI speech processor and HA, giving access to an identical monaural beamformer in both ears. A within-subject repeated measures design evaluated three directional configurations [omnidirectional, asymmetric directivity (in CI alone) and symmetric directivity (in both CI and HA)] in two noise types [stationary and fluctuating]. Bimodal speech reception thresholds (SRT) as well as listening effort ratings were assessed in a diffuse noise field.
Symmetric monaural beamforming provided a significant SRT improvement of 2.6 dB SNR, compared to 1.6 dB SNR for asymmetric monaural beamforming. Directional benefits were similarly observed in stationary and fluctuating noise. Directivity did not contribute to less listening effort in addition to improvement in speech intelligibility. Bimodal performance was about 7 dB SNR worse in fluctuating than in stationary noise.
Monaural beamforming provided substantial benefit for speech intelligibility in noise for bimodal listeners. The greatest benefit occurred when monaural beamforming was activated symmetrically in both CI and HA. Monaural beamforming does not bridge the gap between bimodal and normal hearing performance, especially in fluctuating noise. Results advocate further bimodal co-operation.
This trial was registered in www.trialregister.nl under number NTR4901.
评估双耳植入人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的单耳波束形成。
该研究招募了12名成年双耳使用者,他们至少有6个月的CI使用经验,且白天大部分时间使用对侧助听器(HA)。参与者均佩戴相同的CI言语处理器和HA,双耳均可使用相同的单耳波束形成器。采用受试者内重复测量设计,在两种噪声类型(稳态噪声和波动噪声)下评估三种方向性配置[全向性、非对称指向性(仅CI)和对称指向性(CI和HA均有)]。在扩散声场中评估双耳言语接受阈(SRT)以及聆听努力程度评分。
与非对称单耳波束形成相比,对称单耳波束形成使SRT显著提高了2.6 dB SNR,非对称单耳波束形成为1.6 dB SNR。在稳态噪声和波动噪声中均观察到类似的方向性优势。除了提高言语可懂度外,指向性对减少聆听努力没有作用。在波动噪声中,双耳表现比在稳态噪声中差约7 dB SNR。
单耳波束形成为双耳使用者在噪声环境中的言语可懂度提供了显著益处。当CI和HA均对称激活单耳波束形成时,益处最大。单耳波束形成并未弥合双耳和正常听力表现之间的差距,尤其是在波动噪声中。结果支持进一步开展双耳协同。