Luna H I, Pankey G
Ochsner J. 2001 Apr;3(2):85-93.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) presents both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to clinicians. The prognosis of CAP remains poor with a 4% to 33% fatal outcome. Most initial therapy is necessarily empiric because of the nonspecificity of clinical and radiographic findings and the limitations of diagnostic tests. Severity of illness at initial presentation and the presence of either coexisting illness or advanced age influence the spectrum of etiologic agents and the initial approach to therapy. Although an early etiologic diagnosis is optimal in the management of CAP, in as much as 50% of all patients the responsible pathogen is not defined, even with extensive diagnostic testing. The emphasis in the initial diagnostic approach is to not order extensive tests. The practice of obtaining blood cultures seldom leads to alteration in the therapeutic regimen, even if the cultures are positive. Lack of clinical improvement with empiric therapy, complications from unrelated underlying diseases, and allergic reactions are usually stronger forces for determining change in treatment. Requiring blood cultures only for patients with the greatest risk of mortality from bacteremia from pneumonia would save not only the cost of the blood cultures themselves but also costs resulting from contaminants. As a pragmatic approach, a strategy for microbial investigation linked to illness severity is suggested to replace the current haphazard approach.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)给临床医生带来了诊断和治疗方面的挑战。CAP的预后仍然很差,病死率为4%至33%。由于临床和影像学表现的非特异性以及诊断测试的局限性,大多数初始治疗必然是经验性的。初次就诊时的疾病严重程度以及并存疾病或高龄的存在会影响病原体谱和初始治疗方法。尽管在CAP的管理中早期病因诊断是最佳的,但即便进行了广泛的诊断测试,仍有多达50%的患者无法明确致病病原体。初始诊断方法的重点是不进行广泛的检查。即使血培养结果呈阳性,进行血培养的做法也很少会导致治疗方案的改变。经验性治疗后缺乏临床改善、无关基础疾病的并发症以及过敏反应通常是决定改变治疗的更强有力因素。仅对因肺炎菌血症导致死亡风险最高的患者进行血培养,不仅可以节省血培养本身的成本,还可以节省因污染产生的成本。作为一种务实的方法,建议采用一种与疾病严重程度相关的微生物调查策略来取代当前随意的方法。