• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Content Analysis of Major Textbooks and Online Resources Used in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction.科研行为规范教学中使用的主要教科书和在线资源的内容分析
AJOB Prim Res. 2011;2(1):42-46. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2011.564263.
2
Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.《教学与评估研究的负责任行为:德尔菲共识小组报告》
J Res Adm. 2009 Fall;40(1):49-70.
3
Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.负责任的研究行为指导:CTSA 内部的计划和材料清单。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Jun;3(3):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.
4
Expanding the scope of responsible conduct of research instruction.扩展负责任研究行为教学的范围。
Account Res. 2014;21(5):321-7. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.848802.
5
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.评估关于科研行为责任的教育文献中的核心内容。
Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):207-24. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217420.
6
The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research.扩大当前关于科研行为责任的培训的重要性。
Acad Med. 1998 Dec;73(12):1249-54. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199812000-00013.
7
America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities' RCR Training Plans.美国竞争法案 5 年进展:对研究密集型大学 RCR 培训计划的分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):227-249. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
9
Rethinking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course.重新思考科研行为责任(RCR)课程。
Biomed Eng Educ. 2024 Jul;4(2):251-257. doi: 10.1007/s43683-023-00131-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
10
Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey.美国研究机构是否符合或超过联邦关于负责任研究行为教学的规定?一项全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1237-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318260fe5c.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs in an Arab nation relative to top programs worldwide: A qualitative content analysis.评估一个阿拉伯国家药学硕士项目的研究伦理教育课程与全球顶尖项目的相对情况:一项定性内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0238755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238755. eCollection 2021.
2
Misconceptions About Working in Correctional Psychiatry.关于惩教精神病学工作的误解。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Jun;48(2):251-258. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003921-20. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.发展和初步验证科学工作价值观的新测量工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):393-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9896-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
4
The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.文化和文化适应在研究人员对科学规则的看法中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):361-391. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9876-4. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.跨学科环境科学研究生项目中社会伦理的必要性:美国全国性调查结果
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):565-588. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9775-0. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Smart Teaching Matters! Applying the Research on Learning to Teaching RCR.明智教学至关重要!将学习研究应用于科研行为规范教学
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):88-92. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.849. eCollection 2014 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.《教学与评估研究的负责任行为:德尔菲共识小组报告》
J Res Adm. 2009 Fall;40(1):49-70.
2
Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.负责任的研究行为指导:CTSA 内部的计划和材料清单。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Jun;3(3):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.
3
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
4
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
5
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.评估关于科研行为责任的教育文献中的核心内容。
Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):207-24. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217420.

科研行为规范教学中使用的主要教科书和在线资源的内容分析

Content Analysis of Major Textbooks and Online Resources Used in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction.

作者信息

Kon Alexander A, Schilling Debie A, Heitman Elizabeth, Steneck Nicholas H, Dubois James M

机构信息

University of California-Davis and Naval Medical Center San Diego.

出版信息

AJOB Prim Res. 2011;2(1):42-46. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2011.564263.

DOI:10.1080/21507716.2011.564263
PMID:21766046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3135017/
Abstract

Instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for all trainees funded by the National Institues of Health (NIH) or National Science Foundation (NSF). A recent Delphi study identified 53 key topics in 7 core areas that RCR education experts felt should be included in this instruction, which is required of many trainees in clinical and translational research. We performed a content analysis of major textbooks and online resources used in RCR instruction to determine the extent to which the 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study are covered by these resources. Textbooks and online resources used in RCR education at Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions were identified via survey. These resources were subjected to a content analysis. The 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study formed the basis of these analyses. We identified 10 textbooks and 1 online resource currently in use. Of the 53 key topics, only 4 were included in all 11 resources, and another 12 were included in 10. Twenty-three topics were covered in fewer than 65% of the resources, and two topics were absent from nearly all. Educators in clinical and translational research should be aware of key topics that are not covered in the RCR textbooks and online resources they may use and should consider augmenting discussion of such topics with other materials.

摘要

由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)或美国国家科学基金会(NSF)资助的所有受训人员都需要接受科研行为责任(RCR)方面的指导。最近一项德尔菲研究确定了7个核心领域中的53个关键主题,RCR教育专家认为这些主题应纳入此类指导中,许多临床和转化研究的受训人员都需要接受这种指导。我们对RCR指导中使用的主要教科书和在线资源进行了内容分析,以确定德尔菲研究中确定的53个关键主题在这些资源中的涵盖程度。通过调查确定了临床和转化科学奖机构中RCR教育使用的教科书和在线资源。对这些资源进行了内容分析。德尔菲研究中确定的53个关键主题构成了这些分析的基础。我们确定了目前正在使用的10本教科书和1个在线资源。在这53个关键主题中,只有4个包含在所有11种资源中,另外还有12个包含在10种资源中。23个主题在不到65%的资源中被涵盖,几乎所有资源都未提及两个主题。临床和转化研究的教育工作者应了解他们可能使用的RCR教科书和在线资源中未涵盖的关键主题,并应考虑用其他材料加强对此类主题的讨论。