• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负责任的研究行为指导:CTSA 内部的计划和材料清单。

Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Research Ethics at Washington University School of Medicine and Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics at Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Jun;3(3):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x
PMID:20590680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2898747/
Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) require instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as a component of any Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). The Educational Materials Group of the NIH CTSA Consortium's Clinical Research Ethics Key Function Committee (CRE-KFC) conducted a survey of the 38 institutions that held CTSA funding as of January 2009 to determine how they satisfy RCR training requirements. An 8-item questionnaire was sent by email to directors of the Clinical Research Ethics, the Educational and Career Development, and the Regulatory Knowledge cores. We received 78 completed surveys from 38 CTSAs (100%). We found that there is no unified approach to RCR training across CTSAs, many programs lack a coherent plan for RCR instruction, and most CTSAs have not developed unique instructional materials tailored to the needs of clinical and translational scientists. We recommend collaboration among CTSAs and across CTSA key function committees to address these weaknesses. We also requested that institutions send electronic copies of original RCR training materials to share among CTSAs via the CTSpedia website. Twenty institutions submitted at least one educational product. The CTSpedia now contains more than 90 RCR resources.

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)要求将负责任的研究行为(RCR)作为任何临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的组成部分进行教学。NIH CTSA 联盟临床研究伦理关键职能委员会(CRE-KFC)的教育材料小组对截至 2009 年 1 月获得 CTSA 资助的 38 家机构进行了一项调查,以确定它们如何满足 RCR 培训要求。我们通过电子邮件向临床研究伦理、教育和职业发展以及监管知识核心的主任发送了一份 8 项内容的调查问卷。我们从 38 个 CTSA 中收到了 78 份完整的调查问卷(100%)。我们发现,CTSA 之间的 RCR 培训方法并不统一,许多项目缺乏连贯的 RCR 教学计划,而且大多数 CTSA 尚未针对临床和转化科学家的需求开发独特的教学材料。我们建议 CTSA 之间以及 CTSA 关键职能委员会之间进行合作,以解决这些问题。我们还要求机构通过 CTSpedia 网站向 CTSA 发送原始 RCR 培训材料的电子副本,以实现资源共享。20 家机构提交了至少一个教育产品。CTSpedia 现在包含了 90 多个 RCR 资源。

相似文献

1
Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.负责任的研究行为指导:CTSA 内部的计划和材料清单。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Jun;3(3):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.
2
Emergency Medicine Resources Within the Clinical Translational Science Institutes: A Cross-sectional Study.临床转化科学研究所内的急诊医学资源:一项横断面研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):740-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12926. Epub 2016 May 14.
3
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
4
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
5
Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey.美国研究机构是否符合或超过联邦关于负责任研究行为教学的规定?一项全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1237-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318260fe5c.
6
CTSA-IP: a solution to identifying and aggregating intellectual property across the NIH Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium of biomedical research institutes.CTSA-IP:一种用于确定和聚合美国国立卫生研究院临床转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟内生物医学研究所知识产权的解决方案。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):328-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00308.x.
7
Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers.将实践为基础的研究网络与临床与转化科学奖联系起来:学术健康中心进行社区参与的新机会。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):476-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd2ed3.
8
America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities' RCR Training Plans.美国竞争法案 5 年进展:对研究密集型大学 RCR 培训计划的分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):227-249. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
10
Nurse engagement and contributions to the clinical and translational science awards initiative.护士的参与及其对临床与转化科学奖倡议的贡献。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Jun;6(3):191-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12020. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and evaluating a team development intervention to support interdisciplinary teams.开发并评估一种团队发展干预措施以支持跨学科团队。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):e166. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.831. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs in an Arab nation relative to top programs worldwide: A qualitative content analysis.评估一个阿拉伯国家药学硕士项目的研究伦理教育课程与全球顶尖项目的相对情况:一项定性内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0238755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238755. eCollection 2021.
3
A content analysis of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) strategies for communicating about clinical research participation online.一项关于临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)在线交流临床研究参与策略的内容分析。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Dec;1(6):340-351. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.2.
4
Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity.研究伦理的五个维度:营造研究诚信氛围的利益相关者框架
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):550-555. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001966.
5
The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.文化和文化适应在研究人员对科学规则的看法中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):361-391. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9876-4. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities' RCR Training Plans.美国竞争法案 5 年进展:对研究密集型大学 RCR 培训计划的分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):227-249. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.指导负责任的研究:为教师在研究环境中教授 RCR 创建课程。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):207-226. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9897-z. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency.良好临床实践培训:确定提高培训效率的关键要素和策略。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):480-486. doi: 10.1177/2168479016635220. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
The HIV and Drug Abuse Prevention Research Ethics Training Institute: Training Early-Career Scientists to Conduct Research on Research Ethics.艾滋病病毒与药物滥用预防研究伦理培训学院:培训早期职业科学家开展研究伦理方面的研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):470-80. doi: 10.1177/1556264615614937.
10
Cross-cultural considerations in U.S. research ethics education.美国研究伦理教育中的跨文化考量
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):130-4. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860. eCollection 2014 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.《教学与评估研究的负责任行为:德尔菲共识小组报告》
J Res Adm. 2009 Fall;40(1):49-70.
2
The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program.一项由美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究伦理培训项目的开发与评估。
Acad Med. 2008 Jun;83(6):596-603. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095.
3
A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies.一种用于研究责任行为(RCR)培训发展的定性方法:元认知策略的识别
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):3-31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9035-4. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
4
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.在整个大学范围内扩大负责任的研究行为指导。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):876-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
5
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
6
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
7
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
8
New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research.新研究生关于科研行为责任的基础知识。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):838-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7956.
9
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
10
Ethics education in MSN programs: a study of national trends.护理学硕士项目中的伦理教育:一项关于全国趋势的研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):10-7.