• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在科特迪瓦,为报销药品选择标准征求偏好。

Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire.

机构信息

Economic Evaluation Methods and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Patient. 2011;4(2):125-31. doi: 10.2165/11586060-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11586060-000000000-00000
PMID:21766901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Côte d'Ivoire, a West African country, has decided to set up a formulary as part of its universal health insurance (UHI) program. One of its goals will be to facilitate access to safe and efficacious drugs. To guarantee transparency throughout the formulary listing process, it is important to select and value relevant decision criteria for that purpose.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the preferences of healthcare professionals (physicians) when selecting reimbursable drugs and to analyze trade-offs between criteria for formulary listing in Côte d'Ivoire.

METHODS

Choice sets based on four attributes (cost effectiveness of treatments, severity of the disease for which the treatments are indicated, age of the population affected by diseases considered, and social class affected by diseases considered [poor, rich]) were presented in a self-completion questionnaire.

RESULTS

Analysis of questionnaire responses showed that 'cost effectiveness', 'severity of disease', and 'social class' were significant attributes in responder's preferences for reimbursable drugs. More specifically, respondents' choices were more sensitive to drugs that are very cost effective, that target very severe disease, and that target diseases in poor people.

CONCLUSION

This explorative study enabled us to elicit the preferences of a sample of healthcare professionals (physicians) for reimbursed drug selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire using the discrete-choice experiment method. Further work is required to achieve the ultimate objective of developing a formulary for Côte d'Ivoire.

摘要

背景

科特迪瓦是西非的一个国家,已决定为其全民健康保险(UHI)计划设立一个处方集。其目标之一是为安全有效的药物提供便利。为了确保在整个处方集编制过程中保持透明度,选择和评估相关决策标准非常重要。

目的

调查医疗保健专业人员(医生)在选择可报销药物时的偏好,并分析科特迪瓦处方集编制标准之间的权衡。

方法

在自我完成的问卷中,提供了基于四个属性(治疗的成本效益、治疗所针对疾病的严重程度、受考虑疾病影响的人群年龄以及受考虑疾病影响的社会阶层[贫困、富裕])的选择集。

结果

对问卷回答的分析表明,“成本效益”、“疾病严重程度”和“社会阶层”是应答者对可报销药物偏好的重要属性。具体来说,受访者的选择对非常具有成本效益的药物、针对严重疾病的药物以及针对贫困人口疾病的药物更为敏感。

结论

这项探索性研究使用离散选择实验方法,使我们能够了解科特迪瓦医疗保健专业人员(医生)对报销药物选择标准的偏好。需要进一步努力,以实现为科特迪瓦制定处方集的最终目标。

相似文献

1
Eliciting preferences for reimbursed drugs selection criteria in Côte d'Ivoire.在科特迪瓦,为报销药品选择标准征求偏好。
Patient. 2011;4(2):125-31. doi: 10.2165/11586060-000000000-00000.
2
An application of a proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: the case of Côte d'Ivoire.在低收入国家中应用建议的目录清单制定框架:以科特迪瓦为例。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Nov 1;9(6):389-402. doi: 10.2165/11595220-000000000-00000.
3
Acceptance of HIV in Cote d'Ivoire earns praise.科特迪瓦对艾滋病病毒的接纳受到赞扬。
AIDS Wkly Plus. 1996 Apr 22:15-6.
4
The relationship between depression and sexual health service utilization among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa.西非科特迪瓦男男性行为者(MSM)中抑郁症与性健康服务利用之间的关系。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2019 Mar 5;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12914-019-0186-6.
5
First Field Test of the Novel Integration Mapping Tool for COVID-19 Vaccination Integration into National Immunization Programs and Primary Healthcare-A Case Study from Côte d'Ivoire.将新冠疫苗接种纳入国家免疫规划和初级卫生保健的新型整合映射工具的首次现场测试——来自科特迪瓦的案例研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;11(12):1842. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121842.
6
Workforce patterns in the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV in Côte d'Ivoire: a qualitative model.科特迪瓦预防母婴传播艾滋病毒的劳动力模式:一个定性模型。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jan 11;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0268-x.
7
Risk factors for rabies in Côte d'Ivoire.科特迪瓦狂犬病的风险因素。
Acta Trop. 2020 Dec;212:105711. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105711. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Key Characteristics and Perception of Different Outbreak Surveillance Systems in Côte d'Ivoire: Cross-Sectional Survey Among Users.科特迪瓦不同疫情监测系统的关键特征与认知:用户横断面调查
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 30;10:e56275. doi: 10.2196/56275.
9
Physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward HIV care in the context of the UNAIDS/Ministry of Health Drug Access Initiative in Côte d'Ivoire.在科特迪瓦艾滋病规划署/卫生部药品获取倡议背景下医生对艾滋病毒护理的知识和态度。
AIDS. 2003 Jul;17 Suppl 3:S79-86. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200317003-00011.
10
The Côte d'Ivoire national HIV counseling and testing program for tuberculosis patients: implementation and analysis of epidemiologic data.科特迪瓦针对结核病患者的国家艾滋病毒咨询与检测项目:流行病学数据的实施与分析
AIDS. 1998 Mar 26;12(5):505-12. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199805000-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Eliciting the public preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy in Iran: a discrete choice experiment study.探究伊朗民众对药品补贴的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 13;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00345-4.
2
Attributes Development for Pharmaceutical Subsidization: A Qualitative Study.药品补贴的属性发展:一项定性研究。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2020 Winter;19(1):203-217. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.15507.13136.
3
ELICIT: An alternative imprecise weight elicitation technique for use in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.加纳卫生优先事项中公平与效率的平衡:多标准决策分析的应用
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1081-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00392.x.
2
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.开展离散选择实验以辅助医疗保健决策:用户指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.
3
Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal?
引出法:一种用于医疗保健多标准决策分析的替代不精确权重引出技术。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(1):141-7. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1083863. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
使用多标准进行优先级设定:尼泊尔是否应实施肺部健康计划?
Health Policy Plan. 2007 May;22(3):178-85. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm010. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
4
Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.卫生干预措施的优先级设定:多标准决策分析的必要性。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006 Aug 21;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-14.
5
Developing a prioritisation framework in an English Primary Care Trust.在一家英国初级医疗保健信托机构中制定一个优先级框架。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006 Feb 17;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-3.
6
Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.通过明确标准来阐明效率与公平的权衡,重点关注发展中国家。
Health Care Anal. 2005 Mar;13(1):33-51. doi: 10.1007/s10728-005-2568-2.
7
Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values.乌干达医疗保健领域确定优先事项的标准:利益相关者价值观探索
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Mar;82(3):172-9. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
8
Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.运用离散选择实验评估医疗保健项目:当前实践与未来研究思考
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55-64.
9
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.运用联合分析来获取对医疗保健的偏好。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530.