Suppr超能文献

评估心理灵活性:它在现有结构之上增加了什么?

Assessing psychological flexibility: what does it add above and beyond existing constructs?

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Strasse 46, D-01187 Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):970-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024135. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

The construct of psychological flexibility (PF) is a central concept in acceptance and commitment therapy. It is defined as the process of contacting the present moment fully as a conscious human being and persisting in or changing behavior in the service of chosen values. PF is hypothesized to be an important aspect of healthy psychological functioning. Despite its potential importance, the distinctness of PF from other constructs has not been adequately demonstrated, and psychometric evaluations of measures designed to assess it are limited. This study aimed at extending current knowledge about PF by examining the construct in 2 help-seeking samples, including panic disorder with agoraphobia (n = 368), clinically relevant social phobia (n = 209), and 2 nonclinical samples including students (n = 495) and individuals visiting an employment office (n = 95). Results across all samples indicate that PF, as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (2nd version; AAQ-II), is a unitary construct with a 1 factor model. PF correlated with other variables largely consistent with predictions, differentiated patients from healthy controls, and showed preliminary indications of treatment sensitivity. Incremental validity was partially demonstrated, especially for indices of functioning. Surprisingly, PF also explained unique variance above more established measures for some indices of symptomatology. Results suggest that PF adds some incremental clinical validity, yet further and more stringent tests are required to fully elucidate its strengths and limitations.

摘要

心理灵活性(PF)的构建是接纳与承诺疗法的核心概念。它被定义为充分接触当下时刻的过程,作为一个有意识的人,并坚持或改变行为,以服务于既定的价值观。PF 被假设为健康心理功能的一个重要方面。尽管它具有潜在的重要性,但 PF 与其他结构的区别尚未得到充分证明,用于评估它的测量工具的心理测量评估也有限。本研究旨在通过在 2 个寻求帮助的样本中检查 PF 来扩展关于 PF 的现有知识,包括恐慌症伴广场恐惧症(n = 368)、临床相关社交恐惧症(n = 209),以及包括学生(n = 495)和访问就业办公室的个人(n = 95)在内的 2 个非临床样本。所有样本的结果均表明,PF(通过接纳与行动问卷(第 2 版;AAQ-II)测量)是一个具有 1 个因素模型的单一结构。PF 与其他变量的相关性在很大程度上与预测一致,将患者与健康对照区分开来,并显示出治疗敏感性的初步迹象。部分证明了增量有效性,特别是对功能指数。令人惊讶的是,PF 还解释了一些症状指数的独特方差,超过了更成熟的指标。结果表明,PF 增加了一些增量临床有效性,但需要进一步和更严格的测试来充分阐明其优势和局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验