Crum Patricia M, Morris Harold Frederick, Winkler Sheldon, DesRosiers Deborah, Yoshino Douglas
VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich.
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Feb;40(1):15-8. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00185. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
This in vitro study evaluated agreement among 10 trained evaluators when assessing implant stability with the Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest "M." A difference of 1 Periotest value (PTV) between the wired (-7) and wireless (-8) instruments was observed for the pretest calibration ring. No significant differences were found between the instruments and for all evaluators for all tests (analysis of variance, P < .05). Each instrument can provide meaningful and reproducible recordings of stability measurements.
这项体外研究评估了10名经过培训的评估者在使用有线/经典型和无线/牙周测试“M”评估种植体稳定性时的一致性。在预测试校准环中，观察到有线仪器（-7）和无线仪器（-8）之间的牙周测试值（PTV）相差1。在所有测试中，仪器之间以及所有评估者之间均未发现显著差异（方差分析，P <.05）。每种仪器都能提供有意义且可重复的稳定性测量记录。
