• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[荷兰生物样本库的伦理审查:来自“珍珠链计划”的经验教训]

[Ethical review of biobanks in The Netherlands: lessons from the String of Pearls Initiative].

作者信息

Boeckhout Martin, van Dijk Jet, Legemate Dink A

机构信息

Universiteit van Amsterdam, afd. Wijsbegeerte, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(26):A3557.

PMID:21767425
Abstract

Ethical and legal aspects of biobanking continue to be a topic of concern. The String of Pearls Initiative (PSI) helped establish new norms for biobank governance in The Netherlands. This article gives an overview of issues that emerged from the medical-ethical review processes of PSI. The criteria applied to biobanking projects by Ethical Review Boards were derived from the legally prescribed criteria for medical research. However, these criteria were interpreted in radically diverging ways. Key issues included the legal status of prospective research-dedicated biobanks, informed consent, monitoring of the use of biobanks, and alignment of biobanking policies both within and between research departments. The article calls on all actors involved in biobanking to continue to strive for the harmonization of biobanking policies. A certain degree of central coordination is crucial in order to improve on collaborative biobanking initiatives.

摘要

生物样本库的伦理和法律问题仍然是一个备受关注的话题。“珍珠链计划”(PSI)有助于在荷兰建立生物样本库管理的新规范。本文概述了PSI医学伦理审查过程中出现的问题。伦理审查委员会应用于生物样本库项目的标准源自医学研究的法定标准。然而,这些标准的解释却大相径庭。关键问题包括前瞻性研究专用生物样本库的法律地位、知情同意、生物样本库使用情况的监测,以及研究部门内部和之间生物样本库政策的协调一致。本文呼吁参与生物样本库工作的所有各方继续努力实现生物样本库政策的统一。为了改进合作性生物样本库倡议,一定程度的中央协调至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Ethical review of biobanks in The Netherlands: lessons from the String of Pearls Initiative].[荷兰生物样本库的伦理审查:来自“珍珠链计划”的经验教训]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(26):A3557.
2
[Dutch government invests in existing biobanks].[荷兰政府对现有生物样本库进行投资]。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A2825.
3
Biobank governance: trends and perspectives.生物样本库治理:趋势与展望
Pathobiology. 2007;74(4):206-11. doi: 10.1159/000104446.
4
Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.人类生物样本库使用的伦理和法律框架趋势。
Eur Respir J. 2007 Aug;30(2):373-82. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00165006.
5
'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?生物样本库伦理的“镜像”:我们应从同意书分析中学到什么[已修正]?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
[Ethical aspects of biological sample banks].[生物样本库的伦理问题]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Feb;51(1 Pt 2):101-10.
7
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.生物样本库中的知情同意与研究治理:来自与医学研究人员焦点小组的证据
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
9
[Governance and measures for the ethical and social aspects of biobanks].[生物样本库伦理与社会层面的治理及措施]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2012 Apr;39(4):493-7.
10
Biobanks for non-clinical purposes and the new law on forensic biobanks: does the Italian context protect the rights of minors?非临床目的的生物库和新的法医生物库法:意大利的法律环境是否保护未成年人的权利?
J Med Ethics. 2010 Dec;36(12):775-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037606. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Governing the research-care divide in clinical biobanking: Dutch perspectives.临床生物样本库中研究与医疗之间差异的管理:荷兰视角
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015;11:7. doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0025-z. Epub 2015 Aug 6.