Suppr超能文献

降低老年人久坐时间的可行性。

Feasibility of reducing older adults' sedentary time.

机构信息

University of Queensland, Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):174-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sedentary time (too much sitting, as distinct from lack of exercise) is a prevalent risk to health among older adults.

PURPOSE

Examine the feasibility of an intervention to reduce and break up sedentary time in older adults.

DESIGN

A pre-experimental (pre-post) study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 59 participants aged ≥60 years from Brisbane, Australia. Data were collected between May and December 2009 and analyzed in 2010.

INTERVENTION

One face-to-face goal-setting consultation and one individually tailored mailing providing feedback on accelerometer-derived sedentary time, grounded in social cognitive theory and behavioral choice theory.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Program reach and retention; changes in accelerometer-derived sedentary time, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) (assessed over 6 days in pre- and post-intervention periods); and participant satisfaction.

RESULTS

Reach was 87.5% of those screened and eligible; retention was 100%. From pre- to post-intervention, participants decreased their sedentary time [-3.2% (95% CI= -4.18, -2.14), p<0.001], increased their breaks in sedentary time per day [4.0 (1.48, 6.52), p=0.003], and increased their LIPA [2.2% (1.40, 2.99), p<0.001] and MVPA [1.0% (0.55, 1.38), p<0.001]. Significantly greater reductions in sedentary time were made after 10:00am, with significantly greater number of breaks occurring between 7:00pm and 9:00pm. Participants reported high satisfaction with the program (median 9/10).

CONCLUSIONS

Sedentary time in older adults can be reduced following a brief intervention based on goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring.

摘要

背景

久坐时间(与缺乏运动不同,是指坐得过多)是老年人普遍存在的健康风险。

目的

研究一种减少和打断老年人久坐时间的干预措施的可行性。

设计

预实验(前后)研究。

地点/参与者:来自澳大利亚布里斯班的 59 名年龄≥60 岁的参与者。数据收集于 2009 年 5 月至 12 月,并于 2010 年进行分析。

干预

一次面对面的目标设定咨询和一次个性化的邮件反馈,基于社会认知理论和行为选择理论,提供计步器得出的久坐时间反馈。

主要观察指标

计划的覆盖范围和保留率;计步器得出的久坐时间、低强度体力活动(LIPA)和中高强度体力活动(MVPA)的变化(在干预前后的 6 天内评估);以及参与者的满意度。

结果

筛选和符合条件的参与者中,有 87.5%的人参与了该计划;保留率为 100%。与干预前相比,参与者减少了久坐时间[-3.2%(95%CI=-4.18,-2.14),p<0.001],增加了每天久坐时间的中断次数[4.0(1.48,6.52),p=0.003],并增加了 LIPA[2.2%(1.40,2.99),p<0.001]和 MVPA[1.0%(0.55,1.38),p<0.001]。上午 10 点以后,久坐时间的减少更为显著,晚上 7 点至 9 点之间的中断次数也明显增加。参与者对该计划的满意度很高(中位数为 9/10)。

结论

基于目标设定和行为自我监测的简短干预措施可以减少老年人的久坐时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验