Suppr超能文献

老年人在久坐、轻度和中度强度活动中的时间及其相关因素:澳大利亚时间使用调查的应用

Older adults' time in sedentary, light and moderate intensity activities and correlates: application of Australian Time Use Survey.

作者信息

Espinel Paola T, Chau Josephine Y, van der Ploeg Hidde P, Merom Dafna

机构信息

Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Mar;18(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Understanding how older adults spend their time between active and sedentary activities is an important aspect of healthy ageing. This study examined the time spent in all-domains of sedentary, light and moderate intensity physical activities in old age and identified high-risk groups.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional analysis of Australian 2006 Time Use Survey.

METHODS

Participants comprised non-working older adults with at least one 24-h time use diary (n=992). Primary activities were recoded by activity domain and intensity. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios of having high sedentary time, low light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and being insufficiently active (<30 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, MVPA) by sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Older adults spent 223 and 121 min/day of their waking time in LIPA and MVPA, respectively, mostly (88%) attributed to household chores. One third of participants spent ≥600 min/day in sedentary activities, 63% spent ≥180 min/day in LIPA, 85% achieved sufficient levels of MVPA by all domains, but only 30% of participants by the leisure/transport domains. Neither age nor socio-economic indicators were associated with insufficient MVPA. Marital status and living arrangement were significant correlates of low MVPA and LIPA but moderated by gender. The only correlate of high sedentary time (>10 h/day) was disability or long-term health condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of older Australians are sufficiently active when considering all domains. Household domain is the main source of LIPA and MVPA. In old age, prolonged sitting is associated with disability. Marital status and living arrangements can be used to identify physically inactive seniors.

摘要

目的

了解老年人在活跃和久坐活动之间如何分配时间是健康老龄化的一个重要方面。本研究调查了老年人在久坐、轻度和中度强度体育活动各领域所花费的时间,并确定了高危人群。

设计

对澳大利亚2006年时间使用调查进行横断面分析。

方法

参与者包括至少有一份24小时时间使用日记的非在职老年人(n = 992)。主要活动按活动领域和强度重新编码。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,计算社会人口学变量导致久坐时间长、轻度体育活动(LIPA)量低以及活动不足(中度至剧烈体育活动[MVPA]每天<30分钟)的比值比。

结果

老年人清醒时间中分别有223分钟和121分钟用于LIPA和MVPA,大部分(88%)归因于家务劳动。三分之一的参与者每天久坐时间≥600分钟,63%的参与者每天LIPA时间≥180分钟,85%的参与者在所有领域达到了足够的MVPA水平,但在休闲/交通领域只有30%的参与者达到该水平。年龄和社会经济指标均与MVPA不足无关。婚姻状况和生活安排是MVPA量低和LIPA量低的显著相关因素,但受性别影响。久坐时间长(>10小时/天)的唯一相关因素是残疾或长期健康状况。

结论

考虑所有领域时,大多数澳大利亚老年人活动量充足。家务领域是LIPA和MVPA的主要来源。在老年,久坐时间延长与残疾有关。婚姻状况和生活安排可用于识别身体不活跃的老年人。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验