• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基准测试:如何衡量斯图加特综合肿瘤中心的治疗结果质量]

[Benchmarking: how to measure outcome quality at the comprehensive oncology centre in Stuttgart].

作者信息

Meisner Christoph, Brinkmann Friedhelm, Henke Dagmar, Junack Cornelia, Faisst Simone, Heidemann Else

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.014
PMID:21767795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality-controlled documentation and evaluation of long-term course of disease is essential for measuring the outcome quality in the care of cancer patients. This project, based on the ongoing clinical cancer registry of the Comprehensive Oncology Centre (COC) Stuttgart, was aimed to integrate a long-term follow-up documentation and to compare outcome quality between centres of the OCC.

METHODS

In a prospective, non-randomised, multi-centred, registry-based cohort study overall survival, disease free survival and quality of life were evaluated as indicators of outcome quality. The study included all patients suffering from breast, colon or rectum cancer, who were treated with curative intent in one of the centres of the OCC between Sep 30, 2003, and Dec 31, 2008. Cox regressions were used for the statistical evaluation of differences between centres.

RESULTS

Patients suffering from breast cancer (n=3,213), colon cancer (n=1,216) and rectum cancer (n=847) were eligible for the analysis. They were treated in 10 of 13 centres of the OCC. Statistically significant differences in the overall survival could be demonstrated between centres.

DISCUSSION

This project initiated a regular comparative evaluation of the outcome quality and showed that there are statistically significant differences between centres. Based on these findings, the benchmarking process will have to be further developed and elaborated.

摘要

背景

对癌症患者护理的长期病程进行质量控制的记录和评估对于衡量治疗结果质量至关重要。本项目基于斯图加特综合肿瘤中心(COC)正在进行的临床癌症登记,旨在整合长期随访记录,并比较肿瘤中心联盟(OCC)各中心之间的治疗结果质量。

方法

在一项前瞻性、非随机、多中心、基于登记处的队列研究中,将总生存期、无病生存期和生活质量作为治疗结果质量的指标进行评估。该研究纳入了2003年9月30日至2008年12月31日期间在OCC各中心之一接受根治性治疗的所有乳腺癌、结肠癌或直肠癌患者。采用Cox回归对各中心之间的差异进行统计学评估。

结果

患有乳腺癌(n = 3213)、结肠癌(n = 1216)和直肠癌(n = 847)的患者符合分析条件。他们在OCC的13个中心中的10个中心接受了治疗。各中心之间在总生存期方面存在统计学上的显著差异。

讨论

本项目启动了对治疗结果质量的定期比较评估,并表明各中心之间存在统计学上的显著差异。基于这些发现,基准化过程将需要进一步发展和完善。

相似文献

1
[Benchmarking: how to measure outcome quality at the comprehensive oncology centre in Stuttgart].[基准测试:如何衡量斯图加特综合肿瘤中心的治疗结果质量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.014.
2
[Benchmarking in patient care: depression in Parkinson's disease].[患者护理中的基准评估:帕金森病中的抑郁症]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
Adherence to quality indicators and survival in patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者对质量指标的依从性与生存率
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):217-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181893c4a.
4
[Quality Association for Acute Stroke Treatment Schleswig-Holstein (QugSS)].石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因急性卒中治疗质量协会(QugSS)
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
[Benchmarking in health care: conclusions and recommendations].[医疗保健中的基准评估:结论与建议]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
6
[Does implementation of benchmarking in quality circles improve the quality of care of patients with asthma and reduce drug interaction?].[在质量改进小组中实施标杆管理是否能提高哮喘患者的护理质量并减少药物相互作用?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
7
[Benchmarking in psychiatric acute care--a demonstration project in a hospitals network].[精神科急症护理中的基准评估——医院网络中的一个示范项目]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
8
[Benchmarking and peer reviewing with routine data, using the example of IQM (Initiative Qualitätsmedizin e.V.)].[使用IQM(德国质量医学协会)的示例进行常规数据的基准测试和同行评审]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
[Benchmarking to evaluate the care of patients with cystic fibrosis: an established tool to improve patient care].[通过基准评估来评价囊性纤维化患者的护理:一种改善患者护理的既定工具]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
10
Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?淋巴结总数应作为III期结肠癌护理质量的衡量指标吗?
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):559-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318197f2c8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Clinical Data for the Diagnosis of Breast Tumours in North Afghanistan.临床数据在阿富汗北部乳腺癌诊断中的重要性
Int J Breast Cancer. 2021 Jul 30;2021:6625239. doi: 10.1155/2021/6625239. eCollection 2021.