• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗保健中的基准评估:结论与建议]

[Benchmarking in health care: conclusions and recommendations].

作者信息

Geraedts Max, Selbmann Hans-Konrad

机构信息

Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Witten.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.005
PMID:21767804
Abstract

The German Health Ministry funded 10 demonstration projects and accompanying research of benchmarking in health care. The accompanying research work aimed to infer generalisable findings and recommendations. We performed a meta-evaluation of the demonstration projects and analysed national and international approaches to benchmarking in health care. It was found that the typical benchmarking sequence is hardly ever realised. Most projects lack a detailed analysis of structures and processes of the best performers as a starting point for the process of learning from and adopting best practice. To tap the full potential of benchmarking in health care, participation in voluntary benchmarking projects should be promoted that have been demonstrated to follow all the typical steps of a benchmarking process.

摘要

德国卫生部资助了10个医疗保健领域的示范项目及相关的标杆管理研究。相关研究工作旨在得出可推广的研究结果和建议。我们对示范项目进行了元评估,并分析了国内外医疗保健领域的标杆管理方法。结果发现,典型的标杆管理流程几乎从未得到落实。大多数项目缺乏对最佳绩效者的结构和流程进行详细分析,而这是借鉴和采用最佳实践过程的起点。为充分挖掘医疗保健领域标杆管理的潜力,应推动参与那些已证明遵循标杆管理流程所有典型步骤的自愿标杆管理项目。

相似文献

1
[Benchmarking in health care: conclusions and recommendations].[医疗保健中的基准评估:结论与建议]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
[Benchmarking to evaluate the care of patients with cystic fibrosis: an established tool to improve patient care].[通过基准评估来评价囊性纤维化患者的护理:一种改善患者护理的既定工具]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
3
[Benchmarking in psychiatric acute care--a demonstration project in a hospitals network].[精神科急症护理中的基准评估——医院网络中的一个示范项目]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
4
[QUIPS: quality improvement in postoperative pain management].[QUIPS:术后疼痛管理的质量改进]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):350-3. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.017.
5
[Quality Association for Acute Stroke Treatment Schleswig-Holstein (QugSS)].石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因急性卒中治疗质量协会(QugSS)
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
6
[Results of the evaluation of German benchmarking networks funded by the Ministry of Health].[德国由卫生部资助的基准网络评估结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):339-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
7
[Benchmarking: how to measure outcome quality at the comprehensive oncology centre in Stuttgart].[基准测试:如何衡量斯图加特综合肿瘤中心的治疗结果质量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.014.
8
[Does implementation of benchmarking in quality circles improve the quality of care of patients with asthma and reduce drug interaction?].[在质量改进小组中实施标杆管理是否能提高哮喘患者的护理质量并减少药物相互作用?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
9
[Benchmarking and peer reviewing with routine data, using the example of IQM (Initiative Qualitätsmedizin e.V.)].[使用IQM(德国质量医学协会)的示例进行常规数据的基准测试和同行评审]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
10
[The role of benchmarking seen from the perspective of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA)].[从联邦联合委员会(G-BA)的角度看基准化的作用]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-sensitive quality and benchmarking in hospitals striving for Magnet® or Pathway® designation: A qualitative study.在争取获得磁体(Magnet®)或路径(Pathway®)认证的医院中,护理敏感质量与基准化:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5484-5496. doi: 10.1111/jan.16245. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
[Result-related success rates of cataract operations. Results of a systematic literature review].[白内障手术与结果相关的成功率。系统文献综述结果]
Ophthalmologe. 2012 Jun;109(6):575-82. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2577-0.