Aureon Biosciences, Yonkers, NY 10701, USA.
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10398.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
To compare the performance of a systems-based risk assessment tool with standard defined risk groups and the 10-year postoperative nomogram for predicting disease progression, including biochemical relapse and clinical (systemic) failure.
Clinical variables, biometric profiles and outcome results from a training cohort comprising 373 patients in a published postoperative systems-based prognostic model were obtained. Patients were stratified according to D'Amico standard risk groups, Kattan 10-year postoperative nomogram and prognostic scores from the postoperative tissue model. The association of pathological variables and calculated risk groups with biochemical recurrence and clinical (systemic) failure was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and hazard ratio (HR).
Systems-based post-prostatectomy models to predict significant disease progression (post-treatment clinical failure) were more accurate than the D'Amico defined risk groups and the Kattan 10-year postoperative nomogram (systems model: C-index, 0.84; HR, 17.46; P < 0.001 vs D'Amico: C-index, 0.73; HR, 11; P = 0.001; 10-year nomogram: C-index, 0.79; HR, 5.06; P < 0.001). The systems models were also more accurate than standard risk groups for predicting prostate-specific antigen recurrence (systems model: C-index, 0.76; HR, 8.94; P < 0.001 vs D'Amico C- index, 0.70; HR, 4.67; P < 0.001) and showed incremental improvement over the 10-year postoperative nomogram (C-index, 0.75; HR, 5.83; P < 0.001). The postoperative tissue model provided additional risk discrimination over surgical margin status and extracapsular extension for predicting disease outcome, and was most significant for the clinical (systemic) failure endpoint (surgical margin: C-index, 0.58; HR, 1.57; P= 0.2; extracapsular extension: C-index, 0.62; HR, 2.06; P = 0.04).
Risk assessment models that incorporate characteristics from the patient's own tumour specimen are more accurate than clinical-only nomograms for predicting significant disease outcome. Systems-based tools should provide useful information concerning the appropriate receipt of adjuvant therapy in the post-surgical setting.
比较基于系统的风险评估工具与标准定义的风险组以及 10 年术后列线图在预测疾病进展(包括生化复发和临床(全身)失败)方面的性能。
从发表的术后基于系统的预后模型中包含的 373 名患者的训练队列中获得临床变量、生物统计学特征和结果数据。根据 D'Amico 标准风险组、Kattan 10 年术后列线图和术后组织模型的预后评分对患者进行分层。使用一致性指数(C 指数)和风险比(HR)评估病理变量和计算的风险组与生化复发和临床(全身)失败之间的关联。
用于预测显著疾病进展(治疗后临床失败)的基于前列腺切除术的系统模型比 D'Amico 定义的风险组和 Kattan 10 年术后列线图更准确(系统模型:C 指数,0.84;HR,17.46;P<0.001 与 D'Amico 相比:C 指数,0.73;HR,11;P=0.001;10 年列线图:C 指数,0.79;HR,5.06;P<0.001)。系统模型也比标准风险组更能准确预测前列腺特异性抗原复发(系统模型:C 指数,0.76;HR,8.94;P<0.001 与 D'Amico C 指数相比:0.70;HR,4.67;P<0.001),并且优于 10 年术后列线图(C 指数,0.75;HR,5.83;P<0.001)。术后组织模型在预测疾病结局方面,提供了比手术切缘状态和包膜外扩展更多的风险区分度,对于临床(全身)失败终点最为显著(手术切缘:C 指数,0.58;HR,1.57;P=0.2;包膜外扩展:C 指数,0.62;HR,2.06;P=0.04)。
纳入患者自身肿瘤标本特征的风险评估模型比仅基于临床的列线图更准确地预测重大疾病结局。基于系统的工具应该为术后辅助治疗的适当接受提供有用的信息。