• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Postoperative systems models more accurately predict risk of significant disease progression than standard risk groups and a 10-year postoperative nomogram: potential impact on the receipt of adjuvant therapy after surgery.术后系统模型比标准风险组和 10 年术后列线图更准确地预测疾病显著进展的风险:对手术后辅助治疗的接受情况的潜在影响。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10398.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
2
A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men.两项术前列线图在一组欧洲男性中预测根治性前列腺切除术后复发情况的验证
Urol Oncol. 2002 Jul-Aug;7(4):141-6. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(02)00177-1.
3
Accuracy of the Kattan nomogram across prostate cancer risk-groups.卡坦列线在前列腺癌风险组中的准确性。
BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(1):56-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09838.x. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
4
Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.两种术前风险评估方法预测前列腺癌根治术后复发的能力:来自CaPSURE的数据。
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1126-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155535.25971.de.
5
An external validation of the Candiolo nomogram in a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated by external-beam radiotherapy.外部验证坎迪奥洛列线图在接受外照射放射治疗的前列腺癌患者队列中的应用。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 May 5;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01814-5.
6
Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后早期复发概率的列线图。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.033. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
7
MR-based prognostic nomogram for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.基于磁共振成像的前列腺癌根治术后预后列线图
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;45(2):586-596. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25441. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.澳大利亚前列腺癌患者三种风险评估工具的比较分析。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108 Suppl 2:51-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10687.x.
9
A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients.一项关于预测当代达米科低风险前列腺癌患者分期升级的新列线图的提议。
World J Urol. 2017 Feb;35(2):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1863-x. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
10
Optimum Tools for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Accuracy and Validity.根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者临床结局预测的最优工具:预后准确性和有效性的系统评价。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Oct;15(5):e827-e834. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Overall survival benefit from postoperative radiation therapy for organ-confined, margin-positive prostate cancer.术后放疗对有器官侵犯、切缘阳性的局限性前列腺癌的总生存获益。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 1;79(3):719-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.041. Epub 2010 May 14.
2
Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality.根治性前列腺切除术后的阳性切缘可预测前列腺癌特异性死亡率。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.017.
3
The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point.开放根治性前列腺切除术切缘学习曲线:切缘状态作为肿瘤学终点的意义。
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
4
Focal positive surgical margins decrease disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy even in organ-confined disease.局限性前列腺癌根治术后切缘阳性降低无病生存率,即使是在器官局限性疾病中。
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.088. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
5
The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era.在 PSA 时代根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘对死亡率的影响。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.039. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
6
Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的影响因疾病风险组而异。
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.132.
7
Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.手术切缘阳性的位置、范围和数量并不能提高预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌复发的准确性。
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.046. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
8
Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial.病理T3N0M0前列腺癌的辅助放疗可显著降低转移风险并提高生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期随访
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
9
Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后早期复发概率的列线图。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.033. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
10
Impact of radical prostatectomy positive surgical margins on fear of cancer recurrence: results from CaPSURE.根治性前列腺切除术切缘阳性对癌症复发恐惧的影响:CaPSURE 研究结果。
Urol Oncol. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

术后系统模型比标准风险组和 10 年术后列线图更准确地预测疾病显著进展的风险:对手术后辅助治疗的接受情况的潜在影响。

Postoperative systems models more accurately predict risk of significant disease progression than standard risk groups and a 10-year postoperative nomogram: potential impact on the receipt of adjuvant therapy after surgery.

机构信息

Aureon Biosciences, Yonkers, NY 10701, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10398.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10398.x
PMID:21771247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4035101/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of a systems-based risk assessment tool with standard defined risk groups and the 10-year postoperative nomogram for predicting disease progression, including biochemical relapse and clinical (systemic) failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical variables, biometric profiles and outcome results from a training cohort comprising 373 patients in a published postoperative systems-based prognostic model were obtained. Patients were stratified according to D'Amico standard risk groups, Kattan 10-year postoperative nomogram and prognostic scores from the postoperative tissue model. The association of pathological variables and calculated risk groups with biochemical recurrence and clinical (systemic) failure was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

Systems-based post-prostatectomy models to predict significant disease progression (post-treatment clinical failure) were more accurate than the D'Amico defined risk groups and the Kattan 10-year postoperative nomogram (systems model: C-index, 0.84; HR, 17.46; P < 0.001 vs D'Amico: C-index, 0.73; HR, 11; P = 0.001; 10-year nomogram: C-index, 0.79; HR, 5.06; P < 0.001). The systems models were also more accurate than standard risk groups for predicting prostate-specific antigen recurrence (systems model: C-index, 0.76; HR, 8.94; P < 0.001 vs D'Amico C- index, 0.70; HR, 4.67; P < 0.001) and showed incremental improvement over the 10-year postoperative nomogram (C-index, 0.75; HR, 5.83; P < 0.001). The postoperative tissue model provided additional risk discrimination over surgical margin status and extracapsular extension for predicting disease outcome, and was most significant for the clinical (systemic) failure endpoint (surgical margin: C-index, 0.58; HR, 1.57; P= 0.2; extracapsular extension: C-index, 0.62; HR, 2.06; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk assessment models that incorporate characteristics from the patient's own tumour specimen are more accurate than clinical-only nomograms for predicting significant disease outcome. Systems-based tools should provide useful information concerning the appropriate receipt of adjuvant therapy in the post-surgical setting.

摘要

目的

比较基于系统的风险评估工具与标准定义的风险组以及 10 年术后列线图在预测疾病进展(包括生化复发和临床(全身)失败)方面的性能。

方法

从发表的术后基于系统的预后模型中包含的 373 名患者的训练队列中获得临床变量、生物统计学特征和结果数据。根据 D'Amico 标准风险组、Kattan 10 年术后列线图和术后组织模型的预后评分对患者进行分层。使用一致性指数(C 指数)和风险比(HR)评估病理变量和计算的风险组与生化复发和临床(全身)失败之间的关联。

结果

用于预测显著疾病进展(治疗后临床失败)的基于前列腺切除术的系统模型比 D'Amico 定义的风险组和 Kattan 10 年术后列线图更准确(系统模型:C 指数,0.84;HR,17.46;P<0.001 与 D'Amico 相比:C 指数,0.73;HR,11;P=0.001;10 年列线图:C 指数,0.79;HR,5.06;P<0.001)。系统模型也比标准风险组更能准确预测前列腺特异性抗原复发(系统模型:C 指数,0.76;HR,8.94;P<0.001 与 D'Amico C 指数相比:0.70;HR,4.67;P<0.001),并且优于 10 年术后列线图(C 指数,0.75;HR,5.83;P<0.001)。术后组织模型在预测疾病结局方面,提供了比手术切缘状态和包膜外扩展更多的风险区分度,对于临床(全身)失败终点最为显著(手术切缘:C 指数,0.58;HR,1.57;P=0.2;包膜外扩展:C 指数,0.62;HR,2.06;P=0.04)。

结论

纳入患者自身肿瘤标本特征的风险评估模型比仅基于临床的列线图更准确地预测重大疾病结局。基于系统的工具应该为术后辅助治疗的适当接受提供有用的信息。