Rottgers S Alex, Decesare Gary, Chao Mimi, Smith Darren M, Cray James J, Naran Sanjay, Vecchione Lisa, Grunwaldt Lorelei, Losee Joseph E
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jul;22(4):1260-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6ab7.
A comprehensive study of adverse outcomes after pediatric facial fractures has not been published. This study aimed to determine the incidence and classify adverse outcomes after facial fractures in children while reporting our early results. A retrospective chart review was performed on facial fracture patients identified in the Craniofacial Trauma Database of the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and seen in follow-up from 2003 to 2007. An Adverse Outcome Classification Scheme was developed: type 1, outcomes resulting from the fracture; type 2, outcomes resulting from fracture treatment; and type 3, outcomes resulting from the interaction between the fracture, its treatment, and subsequent growth and development. Fisher exact or χ analyses were completed. A total of 177 pediatric facial fracture patients were identified with 13.3 months of average follow-up. Mean age was 9.8 years (range, 0.4-18.7 y). Of these patients, 41.8% underwent surgery and 57 patients (32.2%) had adverse outcomes (type 1, 14.1%; type 2, 11.3%; and type 3, 15.8%); 26.3% of these had multiple adverse outcomes. Isolated fractures resulted in fewer adverse outcomes and fewer multiple adverse outcomes compared with combined fractures (26.6% versus 45.3%, P = 0.015; 4% versus 18.9%, P = 0.002). Patients treated operatively exhibited more types 1, 2, and 3 and multiple adverse outcomes compared to those treated conservatively (P < 0.01). In our pediatric cohort, 32.2% of patients had an adverse outcome. With longer follow-up and growth and development studies, we will likely see an increase in the incidence of type 3 adverse outcomes. We recommend, whenever possible, conservative treatment of pediatric facial fractures.
尚未发表关于小儿面部骨折后不良后果的全面研究。本研究旨在确定儿童面部骨折后不良后果的发生率并对其进行分类,同时报告我们的早期结果。对匹兹堡儿童医院颅面创伤数据库中识别出的面部骨折患者进行了回顾性图表审查,并对2003年至2007年随访期间的情况进行了分析。制定了不良后果分类方案:1型,由骨折导致的后果;2型,由骨折治疗导致的后果;3型,由骨折、其治疗以及随后的生长发育之间的相互作用导致的后果。完成了Fisher精确检验或χ分析。共识别出177例小儿面部骨折患者,平均随访时间为13.3个月。平均年龄为9.8岁(范围为0.4 - 18.7岁)。在这些患者中,41.8%接受了手术,57例患者(32.2%)出现了不良后果(1型,14.1%;2型,11.3%;3型,15.8%);其中26.3%有多种不良后果。与复合骨折相比,单纯骨折导致的不良后果和多种不良后果更少(26.6%对45.3%,P = 0.015;4%对18.9%,P = 0.002)。与保守治疗的患者相比,接受手术治疗的患者出现1型、2型和3型以及多种不良后果的情况更多(P < 0.01)。在我们的小儿队列中,32.2%的患者有不良后果。随着随访时间延长以及生长发育研究的进行,我们可能会看到3型不良后果的发生率增加。我们建议,只要有可能,对小儿面部骨折采取保守治疗。