Sun Tianze, Kondowe Blessed, Nyirenda Brave Kadoko, Liu Jun, Zhang Hui, Shang Jin
Department of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
Radiology Department, Mzuzu Central Hospital, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Malawi Med J. 2025 Feb 4;36(5):303-307. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v36i5.2. eCollection 2025 Feb.
The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of two-dimensional (2D) CT and three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction techniques in detecting maxillofacial fractures in patients at Mzuzu Central Hospital (MCH).
67 maxillofacial trauma patients admitted to Mzuzu Central Hospital from Jan to Sep 2024 underwent multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) scanning. Images were post-processed using 2D and 3D reconstruction techniques. Clinical and radiological data were collected from the patients, and a comparative analysis of the results from the two reconstruction techniques was performed.
In this study, 52 cases of maxillofacial fractures with a total of 83 fractures were diagnosed by 2D CT reconstruction technology, with a fracture detection rate of 77.61% (52/67). Using 3D CT reconstruction technology, 54 cases of maxillofacial fractures with a total of 91 fractures were diagnosed, and the fracture detection rate was 80.60% (54/67). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the detection rate of maxillofacial fractures between 2D CT and 3D CT reconstruction (χ = 35.945, P = 0.687). In the diagnosis of zygomatic fractures, nasal fractures, and upper and lower jaw fractures, 3D CT reconstruction images have obvious advantages over 2D CT in displaying fracture displacement and fracture line course. However, for the display of comminuted fractures combined with sphenoid and ethmoid fractures, the cross-sectional images of 2D CT show higher superiority.
2D CT reconstruction is a basic diagnostic tool for maxillofacial fractures. 3D reconstruction, with high detection and multi-angle visualization, offers valuable imaging for clinical decision-making, aiding in surgery planning. A combined approach, leveraging the strengths of both modalities, is pivotal for comprehensive assessment and management of maxillofacial trauma.
本研究旨在比较二维(2D)CT和三维(3D)CT重建技术在姆祖祖中心医院(MCH)患者颌面部骨折检测中的诊断价值。
2024年1月至9月入住姆祖祖中心医院的67例颌面部创伤患者接受了多层螺旋CT(MSCT)扫描。图像采用二维和三维重建技术进行后处理。收集患者的临床和放射学数据,并对两种重建技术的结果进行对比分析。
本研究中,二维CT重建技术诊断出52例颌面部骨折,共83处骨折,骨折检出率为77.61%(52/67)。采用三维CT重建技术,诊断出54例颌面部骨折,共91处骨折,骨折检出率为80.60%(54/67)。统计学分析显示,二维CT和三维CT重建在颌面部骨折检出率上无显著差异(χ = 35.945,P = 0.687)。在颧骨骨折、鼻骨骨折以及上下颌骨折的诊断中,三维CT重建图像在显示骨折移位和骨折线走行方面比二维CT具有明显优势。然而,对于合并蝶骨和筛骨骨折的粉碎性骨折的显示,二维CT的横断面图像显示出更高的优越性。
二维CT重建是颌面部骨折的基本诊断工具。三维重建具有高检出率和多角度可视化的特点,为临床决策提供了有价值的影像学依据,有助于手术规划。结合两种模式的优势的联合方法对于颌面部创伤的综合评估和管理至关重要。