Department of Medicine and Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Jan;32(1):50-6. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.102. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is commonly used to assess irreversibly infarcted tissue but its accuracy is challenged by reports of diffusion lesion reversal (DLR). We investigated the frequency and implications for mismatch classification of DLR using imaging from the EPITHET (Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial) and DEFUSE (Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution) studies. In 119 patients (83 treated with IV tissue plasminogen activator), follow-up images were coregistered to acute diffusion images and the lesions manually outlined to their maximal visual extent in diffusion space. Diffusion lesion reversal was defined as voxels of acute diffusion lesion that corresponded to normal brain at follow-up (i.e., final infarct, leukoaraiosis, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) voxels were excluded from consideration). The appearance of DLR was visually checked for artifacts, the volume calculated, and the impact of adjusting baseline diffusion lesion volume for DLR volume on perfusion-diffusion mismatch analyzed. Median DLR volume reduced from 4.4 to 1.5 mL after excluding CSF/leukoaraiosis. Visual inspection verified 8/119 (6.7%) with true DLR, median volume 2.33 mL. Subtracting DLR from acute diffusion volume altered perfusion-diffusion mismatch (T(max)>6 seconds, ratio>1.2) in 3/119 (2.5%) patients. Diffusion lesion reversal between baseline and 3 to 6 hours DWI was also uncommon (7/65, 11%) and often transient. Clinically relevant DLR is uncommon and rarely alters perfusion-diffusion mismatch. The acute diffusion lesion is generally a reliable signature of the infarct core.
弥散加权成像(DWI)常用于评估不可逆性梗死组织,但有报道称弥散病变逆转(DLR)会影响其准确性。我们通过 EPITHET(Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial)和 DEFUSE(Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution)研究的影像学资料,研究了 DLR 的发生频率及其对不匹配分类的影响。在 119 例患者(83 例接受 IV 组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗)中,将随访图像与急性弥散图像配准,并在弥散空间中手动将病变最大程度地勾画到弥散图像上。弥散病变逆转定义为与随访时正常脑相对应的急性弥散病变体素(即最终梗死、脑白质疏松和脑脊髓液(CSF)体素不考虑)。对 DLR 的外观进行了人工检查,以排除伪影,并计算了其体积,还分析了调整基线弥散病变体积以适应 DLR 体积对灌注-弥散不匹配的影响。排除 CSF/脑白质疏松后,DLR 体积中位数从 4.4 降至 1.5mL。视觉检查证实 8/119(6.7%)例患者存在真正的 DLR,其体积中位数为 2.33mL。从急性弥散体积中减去 DLR 改变了 3/119(2.5%)例患者的灌注-弥散不匹配(T(max)>6 秒,比值>1.2)。基线至 3-6 小时 DWI 之间的弥散病变逆转也不常见(7/65,11%),且常常是短暂的。临床上有意义的 DLR 并不常见,且很少改变灌注-弥散不匹配。急性弥散病变通常是梗死核心的可靠特征。