• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完全腹膜外技术与原发性腹股沟疝修补术的比较

Comparison of totally extraperitoneal technique and darn plication of primary inguinal hernia.

作者信息

Bektaş Hasan, Bilsel Yılmaz, Ersöz Feyzullah, Sarı Serkan, Mutlu Tahir, Arıkan Soykan, Kaygusuz Arslan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Sep;21(7):583-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0518. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2010.0518
PMID:21774699
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term results of primary inguinal hernia repair and to compare the results for a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure with the results of patients undergoing darn plication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this study, 166 patients with unilateral inguinal hernias were randomly assigned to undergo either TEP (n=78) or darn plication (n=88).

RESULTS

The mean operation time for darn plication (16±14.7 minutes) was significantly shorter than TEP hernioplasty (42.1±35.6 minutes, P=.007), but the postoperative recovery time and return to work were significantly less shorter for TEP (P=.001). The frequencies of complications (11.5% versus 12.5%) and recurrences (2.5% versus 3.4%) were approximately equal in the two groups. The frequency of chronic groin pain (2.5% versus 14.1%, P=.008) and numbness (1.2% versus 6.8%, P=.01) was significantly lower in the TEP group. The majority of patients (92%) receiving TEP reported being "very satisfied" with the outcome of surgery compared with only 68 (77.2%) "very satisfied" patients in the darn group (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

TEP repair is comparable to darn plication in terms of complications and recurrences. Unilateral TEP can be safely and efficiently accomplished in less than 45 minutes, even during the initial learning phase. TEP is more comfortable for patients and results in earlier ambulation and return to work. The qualitative accounts given by the patients also support the advantages of TEP in postoperative period.

摘要

引言

这项前瞻性、随机、对照临床研究旨在评估原发性腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期和长期结果,并比较完全腹膜外(TEP)手术与接受疝修补术患者的结果。

材料与方法

本研究中,166例单侧腹股沟疝患者被随机分配接受TEP手术(n = 78)或疝修补术(n = 88)。

结果

疝修补术的平均手术时间(16±14.7分钟)明显短于TEP疝修补术(42.1±35.6分钟,P = 0.007),但TEP术后恢复时间和恢复工作时间明显更短(P = 0.001)。两组并发症(11.5%对12.5%)和复发率(2.5%对3.4%)大致相等。TEP组慢性腹股沟疼痛(2.5%对14.1%,P = 0.008)和麻木(1.2%对6.8%,P = 0.01)的发生率明显更低。接受TEP手术的大多数患者(92%)报告对手术结果“非常满意”,而疝修补术组只有68例(77.2%)“非常满意”的患者(P = 0.01)。

结论

在并发症和复发方面,TEP修补术与疝修补术相当。即使在初始学习阶段,单侧TEP也能在不到45分钟的时间内安全有效地完成。TEP对患者来说更舒适,能使患者更早下床活动并恢复工作。患者给出的定性描述也支持TEP在术后阶段的优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of totally extraperitoneal technique and darn plication of primary inguinal hernia.完全腹膜外技术与原发性腹股沟疝修补术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Sep;21(7):583-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0518. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
3
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的随机临床试验:一项长期随访研究
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023.
4
Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与李金斯坦修补术(LEVEL 试验)的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):819-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d96c32.
5
Simultaneous laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of bilateral inguinal hernia: review of 1 surgeon experiences.腹腔镜同期完全腹膜外修补双侧腹股沟疝:1名外科医生的经验回顾
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):264-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822177fd.
6
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与开放网片修补术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2003 May;133(5):464-72. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.98.
7
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与开放网片修补术:一项随机对照试验的长期随访
Surgery. 2008 Mar;143(3):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.028. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
8
Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach for inguinal hernia: the favorable learning curve for trainees.腹股沟疝的完全腹膜外(TEP)入路:对实习生来说良好的学习曲线
Curr Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;60(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7944(02)00657-8.
9
Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair with alloplastic material: do the subjective and objective parameters differ in the long-term course?使用异体材料的腹腔镜和开放腹股沟疝修补术:长期过程中主观和客观参数是否存在差异?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Oct;18(5):457-63. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31817f4d70.
10
Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge.完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与开放腹膜外入路腹股沟疝修补术的比较:基于当前知识成果的荟萃分析
Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术患者性功能障碍的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 14;408(1):277. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03006-z.
2
Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.不同的腹股沟疝修补术后恢复期建议:系统范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.
对腹股沟疝修补术随机对照试验和荟萃分析的结局报告进行详细分析。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1299-4. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
4
EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.欧洲内镜外科学会腹股沟疝内镜修补术共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3505-19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3001-9. Epub 2013 May 25.