Suppr超能文献

应用体外冲击波治疗加速浅二度烧伤创面表皮再生的前瞻性随机二期临床试验。

Prospective randomized phase II Trial of accelerated reepithelialization of superficial second-degree burn wounds using extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

机构信息

Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Zentrum für Schwerbrandverletzte mit Plastischer Chirurgie, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318227b3c0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can enhance healing of skin graft donor sites, this study focused on shock wave effects in burn wounds.

METHODS

A predefined cohort of 50 patients (6 with incomplete data or lost to follow-up) with acute second-degree burns from a larger study of 100 patients were randomly assigned between December 2006 and December 2007 to receive standard therapy (burn wound debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n = 22) or without (n = 22) defocused ESWT (100 impulses/cm at 0.1 mJ/mm) applied once to the study burn, after debridement. Randomization sequence was computer-generated, and patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint, time to complete burn wound epithelialization, was determined by independent, blinded-observer. A worst case scenario was applied to the missing cases to rule out the impact of withdrawal bias.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics across the 2 study groups were balanced (P > 0.05) except for older age (53 ± 17 vs. 38 ± 13 years, P = 0.002) in the ESWT group. Mean time to complete (≥95%) epithelialization (CE) for patients that did and did not undergo ESWT was 9.6 ± 1.7 and 12.5 ± 2.2 days, respectively (P < 0.0005). When age (continuous variable) and treatment group (binary) were examined in a linear regression model to control the baseline age imbalance, time to CE, age was not significant (P = 0.33) and treatment group retained significance (P < 0.0005). Statistical significance (P = 0.001) was retained when ESWT cases with missing follow-up were assigned the longest time to CE and when controls with missing follow-up were assigned the shortest time to CE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized phase II study, application of a single defocused shock wave treatment to the superficial second-degree burn wound after debridement/topical antiseptic therapy significantly accelerated epithelialization. This finding warrants confirmation in a larger phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01242423).

摘要

背景

体外冲击波疗法 (ESWT) 可促进皮肤移植物供体部位的愈合,本研究专注于冲击波对烧伤创面的影响。

方法

2006 年 12 月至 2007 年 12 月,从一项包含 100 例患者的较大规模研究中,选取了 50 例具有急性二度烧伤的患者(6 例数据不完整或失访),按随机数字表法分为标准治疗组(n = 22)和标准治疗+聚焦式冲击波治疗组(n = 22)。标准治疗为清创+局部抗菌治疗,聚焦式冲击波治疗为清创后对研究性烧伤创面应用 100 个/cm 脉冲(0.1 mJ/mm)的聚焦式冲击波,各 1 次。随机序列由计算机生成,患者对治疗分组不知情。主要结局指标为创面完全上皮化时间,由独立、盲法观察者确定。对缺失数据采用最坏情况分析排除退出偏倚的影响。

结果

两组患者的特征除聚焦式冲击波治疗组年龄较大(53 ± 17 岁 vs. 38 ± 13 岁,P = 0.002)外,其余均均衡(P > 0.05)。接受聚焦式冲击波治疗和未接受聚焦式冲击波治疗的患者创面完全上皮化的中位时间分别为 9.6 ± 1.7 和 12.5 ± 2.2 天(P < 0.0005)。当线性回归模型中同时纳入年龄(连续变量)和治疗分组(二分类变量)来控制基线年龄不均衡时,年龄的影响无统计学意义(P = 0.33),而治疗分组的影响仍有统计学意义(P < 0.0005)。当缺失随访的聚焦式冲击波治疗病例被分配最长的上皮化时间,以及缺失随访的对照组被分配最短的上皮化时间时,统计学意义仍有保留(P = 0.001)。

结论

在这项随机二期研究中,清创+局部抗菌治疗后对浅二度烧伤创面应用单次聚焦式冲击波治疗显著加快了上皮化速度。这一发现需要在更大规模的三期临床试验中进一步证实(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01242423)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验