Marin-Kuan M, Ehrlich V, Delatour T, Cavin C, Schilter B
Chemical Food Safety Group, Quality & Safety Department, Nestlé Research Center, P.O. Box 44, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, 1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland.
J Toxicol. 2011;2011:645361. doi: 10.1155/2011/645361. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
The in vitro and in vivo evidence compatible with a role for oxidative stress in OTA carcinogenicity has been collected and described. Several potential oxido-reduction mechanisms have been identified in the past. More recently, the possibility of a reduction of cellular antioxidant defense has been raised as an indirect source of oxidative stress. Consequences resulting from the production of oxidative stress are observed at different levels. First, OTA exposure has been associated with increased levels of oxidative DNA, lipid, and protein damage. Second, various biological processes known to be mobilized under oxidative stress were shown to be altered by OTA. These effects have been observed in both in vitro and in vivo test systems. In vivo, active doses were often within doses documented to induce renal tumors in rats. In conclusion, the evidence for the induction of an oxidative stress response resulting from OTA exposure can be considered strong. Because the contribution of the oxidative stress response in the development of cancers is well established, a role in OTA carcinogenicity is plausible. Altogether, the data reviewed above support the application of a threshold-based approach to establish safe level of dietary human exposure to OTA.
与氧化应激在OTA致癌性中所起作用相关的体外和体内证据已被收集和描述。过去已经确定了几种潜在的氧化还原机制。最近,细胞抗氧化防御能力下降作为氧化应激的间接来源这一可能性也被提出。氧化应激产生的后果在不同层面都有观察到。首先,OTA暴露与氧化DNA、脂质和蛋白质损伤水平的增加有关。其次,已知在氧化应激下被调动的各种生物过程被证明会因OTA而改变。这些效应在体外和体内测试系统中均有观察到。在体内,活性剂量通常在已记录的可诱导大鼠肾肿瘤的剂量范围内。总之,OTA暴露导致氧化应激反应的证据可以被认为是充分的。由于氧化应激反应在癌症发展中的作用已得到充分证实,因此其在OTA致癌性中发挥作用是合理的。综上所述,上述审查的数据支持采用基于阈值的方法来确定人类膳食中OTA暴露的安全水平。