Leung Joseph W, Ransibrahmanakul Kanat, Toomsen Lee, Mann Surinder K, Siao-Salera Rodelei, Leung Felix W
Gastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center, VANCHCS, Mather, CA, USA.
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):53-58. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16827.
The water method is easy-to-learn and improves colonoscopy outcomes. Dye-spray chromoendoscopy enhances ADR but has not been widely accepted for routine application in screening or surveillance colonoscopy. HYPOTHESIS: With dye added to the water used in the water method, ADR can be enhanced compared with the water or air method alone. OBJECTIVE: To compare ADR determined by the air method, water method alone, and water method with indigo carmine (0.008%) added. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement program. SETTING: VA endoscopy unit. PATIENT: Screening or surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients (n=50/group) underwent colonoscopy with each of the three methods. Water method involved warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation coupled with removal of residual air by suction and residual feces by water exchange. ADR and procedural data were collected prospectively to monitor performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ADR. RESULTS: ADR in the air method, water method alone and water method with indigo carmine were 36%, 40% and 62%, respectively. Water method with indigo carmine produced significantly higher ADR than the air or water method alone (p<0.05). LIMITATIONS: Non-randomized data, single VA site, retrospective comparison. Absence of significant difference between air and water methods could be a type II error due to small number of patients CONCLUSIONS: The approach with indigo carmine added to the water used in the water method yielded significantly higher ADR than the water or the air method alone. The data suggest that a prospective RCT to compare the different methods is warranted.
水灌肠法易于学习且能改善结肠镜检查结果。染料喷洒染色内镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率(ADR),但尚未被广泛接受用于筛查或监测结肠镜检查的常规应用。假设:在水灌肠法所用的水中添加染料,与单独使用水灌肠法或空气灌肠法相比,可提高ADR。目的:比较空气灌肠法、单独水灌肠法以及添加靛胭脂(0.008%)的水灌肠法所测定的ADR。设计:回顾在一项质量改进项目中前瞻性收集的数据。地点:退伍军人事务部内镜检查单元。患者:接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查者。方法:患者(每组n = 50)分别采用三种方法接受结肠镜检查。水灌肠法包括注入温水以代替空气注入,并通过抽吸清除残留空气以及通过换水清除残留粪便。前瞻性收集ADR和操作数据以监测检查效果。主要观察指标:ADR。结果:空气灌肠法、单独水灌肠法以及添加靛胭脂的水灌肠法的ADR分别为36%、40%和62%。添加靛胭脂的水灌肠法所产生的ADR显著高于单独的空气灌肠法或水灌肠法(p<0.05)。局限性:非随机数据,单一退伍军人事务部地点,回顾性比较。空气灌肠法和水灌肠法之间无显著差异可能是由于患者数量少导致的II类错误。结论:在水灌肠法所用的水中添加靛胭脂的方法所产生的ADR显著高于单独的水灌肠法或空气灌肠法。数据表明有必要进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验来比较不同方法。