• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The water method combined with chromoendoscopy enhances adenoma detection.水法联合色素内镜检查可提高腺瘤的检出率。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):53-58. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16827.
2
A prospective RCT comparing combined chromoendoscopy with water exchange (CWE) vs water exchange (WE) vs air insufflation (AI) in adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.一项前瞻性 RCT 比较了联合染色内镜与水交换(CWE)、水交换(WE)和空气注入(AI)在筛查结肠镜检查中腺瘤检测中的效果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 May;7(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/2050640619832196. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation.回顾性分析表明,水洗法提高了腺瘤检出率——一项产生假设的观察结果。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):3-7. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14585.
4
Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid in the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.添加靛胭脂染料至醋酸用于胃肿瘤诊断的色素内镜检查:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1065. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
5
Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.用于筛查结肠镜检查的水交换可提高腺瘤检出率:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 May;49(5):456-467. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101229. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Oral indigo carmine for the detection of colon adenoma.口服靛胭脂用于检测结肠腺瘤。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;56(3):351-355. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1867897. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.水交换法显著提高腺瘤检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
9
Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation.前瞻性多中心随机对照试验比较了水交换、水浸和注气在结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
10
A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy.一项水辅助结肠镜检查与空气充气结肠镜检查的双中心随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):212-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353604. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?技术能否提高结肠镜检查的质量?
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jul;18(7):38. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0505-1.
2
Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.优化结肠镜检查质量:从肠道准备到监测
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;14(1):115-27. doi: 10.1007/s11938-016-0073-3.
3
Chromocolonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Dive into the Big Blue.用于结直肠癌筛查的色素结肠镜检查:深入探索蓝色大海。 (注:此处“Big Blue”字面意思是“大蓝”,结合语境可能是一个特定的指代,比如某个研究项目、数据集等,但仅从字面看直接翻译为“蓝色大海”较符合语言习惯,具体含义可能需根据更多背景信息确定)
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):112-113. doi: 10.4161/jig.23729. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
4
Indigocarmine added to the water exchange method enhances adenoma detection - a RCT.靛胭脂添加到水交换法中可提高腺瘤检测率——一项随机对照试验。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):106-111. doi: 10.4161/jig.23728. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
5
Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with a greater reduction of pain score - review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water method colonoscopy.在插入过程中主要去除注入的水(水交换)始终与疼痛评分的更大降低相关——水法结肠镜检查随机对照试验(RCT)的综述。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):114-120. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18510. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?无镇静结肠镜检查是否可行?
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14592.
2
The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients.水法显著提高了未使用镇静剂患者近端小腺瘤的检出率。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):8-13. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14587.
3
Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation.回顾性分析表明,水洗法提高了腺瘤检出率——一项产生假设的观察结果。
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):3-7. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14585.
4
A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation.一项随机对照试验,旨在确认水法对接受按需镇静的美国退伍军人行结肠镜检查的有益效果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.020.
5
A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method.水法在择期无镇静结肠镜检查中改善结局的原理验证、前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
6
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.结肠镜检查的质量指标与间隔期癌症风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
7
Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study.晨服聚乙二醇电解质溶液与分次服用聚乙二醇电解质溶液用于下午结肠镜检查的疗效比较:一项随机对照单盲研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;105(9):1954-61. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.160. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
8
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.高清电子染色结肠镜与高清白光结肠镜用于一般风险结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
9
Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study.结肠镜检查后对右侧和左侧结直肠肿瘤的保护作用:基于人群的研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jan 20;102(2):89-95. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp436. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
10
High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy.高清结肠镜检查比标准白光结肠镜检查检测结直肠息肉的检出率更高。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

水法联合色素内镜检查可提高腺瘤的检出率。

The water method combined with chromoendoscopy enhances adenoma detection.

作者信息

Leung Joseph W, Ransibrahmanakul Kanat, Toomsen Lee, Mann Surinder K, Siao-Salera Rodelei, Leung Felix W

机构信息

Gastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center, VANCHCS, Mather, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):53-58. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16827.

DOI:10.4161/jig.1.2.16827
PMID:21776426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3136854/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The water method is easy-to-learn and improves colonoscopy outcomes. Dye-spray chromoendoscopy enhances ADR but has not been widely accepted for routine application in screening or surveillance colonoscopy. HYPOTHESIS: With dye added to the water used in the water method, ADR can be enhanced compared with the water or air method alone. OBJECTIVE: To compare ADR determined by the air method, water method alone, and water method with indigo carmine (0.008%) added. DESIGN: Review of prospectively collected data in a performance improvement program. SETTING: VA endoscopy unit. PATIENT: Screening or surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients (n=50/group) underwent colonoscopy with each of the three methods. Water method involved warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation coupled with removal of residual air by suction and residual feces by water exchange. ADR and procedural data were collected prospectively to monitor performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: ADR. RESULTS: ADR in the air method, water method alone and water method with indigo carmine were 36%, 40% and 62%, respectively. Water method with indigo carmine produced significantly higher ADR than the air or water method alone (p<0.05). LIMITATIONS: Non-randomized data, single VA site, retrospective comparison. Absence of significant difference between air and water methods could be a type II error due to small number of patients CONCLUSIONS: The approach with indigo carmine added to the water used in the water method yielded significantly higher ADR than the water or the air method alone. The data suggest that a prospective RCT to compare the different methods is warranted.

摘要

背景

水灌肠法易于学习且能改善结肠镜检查结果。染料喷洒染色内镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率(ADR),但尚未被广泛接受用于筛查或监测结肠镜检查的常规应用。假设:在水灌肠法所用的水中添加染料,与单独使用水灌肠法或空气灌肠法相比,可提高ADR。目的:比较空气灌肠法、单独水灌肠法以及添加靛胭脂(0.008%)的水灌肠法所测定的ADR。设计:回顾在一项质量改进项目中前瞻性收集的数据。地点:退伍军人事务部内镜检查单元。患者:接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查者。方法:患者(每组n = 50)分别采用三种方法接受结肠镜检查。水灌肠法包括注入温水以代替空气注入,并通过抽吸清除残留空气以及通过换水清除残留粪便。前瞻性收集ADR和操作数据以监测检查效果。主要观察指标:ADR。结果:空气灌肠法、单独水灌肠法以及添加靛胭脂的水灌肠法的ADR分别为36%、40%和62%。添加靛胭脂的水灌肠法所产生的ADR显著高于单独的空气灌肠法或水灌肠法(p<0.05)。局限性:非随机数据,单一退伍军人事务部地点,回顾性比较。空气灌肠法和水灌肠法之间无显著差异可能是由于患者数量少导致的II类错误。结论:在水灌肠法所用的水中添加靛胭脂的方法所产生的ADR显著高于单独的水灌肠法或空气灌肠法。数据表明有必要进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验来比较不同方法。