North Carolina Institute of Public Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1543-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300199. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
To advance understanding of public health accreditation, we analyzed data on the North Carolina Local Health Department Accreditation program. We surveyed accredited health departments on barriers to and supports of accreditation preparation, performance on accreditation standards, and benefits and improvements after accreditation. All 48 accredited agencies responded to the survey. All agencies improved policies to prepare for accreditation and met most accreditation standards. Forty-six percent received local funds for accreditation preparation. The most common barrier to accreditation preparation was time and schedule limitations (79%). Fifty percent of agencies acted on suggestions for improvement, and 67% conducted quality improvement activities. Benefits of accreditation included improvements in local partnerships. Agencies of all sizes conducted accreditation activities, were successfully accredited, and experienced benefits resulting from accreditation.
为了增进对公共卫生认证的理解,我们分析了北卡罗来纳州地方卫生部门认证计划的数据。我们对认证的卫生部门进行了调查,了解认证准备工作的障碍和支持、在认证标准方面的表现,以及认证后的收益和改进。所有 48 个认证机构都对调查做出了回应。所有机构都改进了准备认证的政策,并符合大多数认证标准。46%的机构获得了地方认证准备资金。认证准备工作的最大障碍是时间和日程安排的限制(79%)。50%的机构对改进建议采取了行动,67%的机构开展了质量改进活动。认证的好处包括改善了当地的合作伙伴关系。所有规模的机构都开展了认证活动,成功获得认证,并从认证中获得了收益。