• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于案例的讨论有价值吗?

Is there a value to case-based discussion?

作者信息

Bodgener Susan, Tavabie Abdol

机构信息

Kent, Surrey and Sussex GP Deanery, UK.

出版信息

Educ Prim Care. 2011 Jul;22(4):223-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494004.

DOI:10.1080/14739879.2011.11494004
PMID:21781388
Abstract

Case-based discussion (CbD) is a workplace-based assessment which is used formatively to help develop a GP trainee's performance and which will also contribute to the judgement made on a trainee's competence at the end of their training. The views of GP trainers and trainee's in their final year of training were explored quantitively to identify if CbD was of value, its limitations and whether or not it could assess a trainee's performance. The results suggest as an isolated assessment it is not possible to fully assess performance. The feedback received by the trainee did encourage the learner to develop and an improvement in performance in subsequent assessments could be demonstrated. This, however, relied on the skills and confidence of the educator in giving feedback. Further work on the development of feedback skills need to be introduced for the benefits of this assessment to be maximised.

摘要

基于案例的讨论(CbD)是一种基于工作场所的评估,用于形成性地帮助全科医生培训学员提高表现,并且在培训结束时也将有助于对学员能力进行评判。对全科医生培训师和处于培训最后一年的学员的观点进行了定量探究,以确定CbD是否有价值、其局限性以及它是否能够评估学员的表现。结果表明,作为一种单独的评估,不可能全面评估表现。学员收到的反馈确实鼓励了学习者的发展,并且可以证明在后续评估中表现有所改善。然而,这依赖于教育工作者提供反馈的技能和信心。需要进一步开展关于反馈技能发展的工作,以使这种评估的益处最大化。

相似文献

1
Is there a value to case-based discussion?基于案例的讨论有价值吗?
Educ Prim Care. 2011 Jul;22(4):223-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494004.
2
Consistency and reliability of judgements by assessors of case based discussions in general practice specialty training programmes in the United Kingdom.英国全科医学专业培训项目中基于案例讨论的评估者判断的一致性和可靠性。
Educ Prim Care. 2017 Jan;28(1):45-49. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1229579. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Do trainees value feedback in case-based discussion assessments?学员是否重视基于案例的讨论评估中的反馈?
Med Teach. 2013 May;35(5):e1166-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.731100. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
The progressive challenge of assessing a GP trainee's clinical skills in the workplace: a UK update.评估全科医生培训学员职场临床技能面临的持续挑战:英国最新情况
Educ Prim Care. 2015 Mar;26(2):60-2. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494314.
5
Formative assessment of GP trainees' clinical skills.对全科医生培训学员临床技能的形成性评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Mar;23(2):101-6. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494084.
6
In-training assessment developments in postgraduate education in Europe.欧洲研究生教育中的在职培训评估发展
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jun;83(6):454-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12190. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
7
Workplace Based Assessment: Tools to assess competencies in a clinical setting.基于工作场所的评估:在临床环境中评估能力的工具。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(Suppl 1)(1):S89-S93.
8
Competency-based training: who benefits?基于能力的培训:谁受益?
Postgrad Med J. 2013 Feb;89(1048):107-10. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-130881. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
9
Is the rating result reliable? A new approach to respond to a medical trainee's concerns about the reliability of Mini-CEX assessment.评分结果可靠吗?一种回应医学实习生对迷你临床演练评估可靠性担忧的新方法。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 May;121(5):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
10
Can we redesign the MRCGP assessment to support lifelong learning?
Educ Prim Care. 2019 Jan;30(1):9-12. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2018.1563507. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Can case-based discussions in a group setting be used to assess residents' clinical skills?小组式病例讨论可用于评估住院医师的临床技能吗?
Int J Med Educ. 2021 Apr 9;12:64-73. doi: 10.5116/ijme.606a.eb39.
2
Case-Based Discussion in United Kingdom General Practice Training: A Critical Analysis.英国全科医学培训中的案例讨论:批判性分析
Cureus. 2021 Feb 6;13(2):e13166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13166.
3
Perspectives on procedure-based assessments: a thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with 10 UK surgical trainees.基于程序的评估之观点:对10名英国外科实习医生半结构化访谈的主题分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e013417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013417.