Odegaard J, Segner D
Department of Orthodontics, Universitäts Krankenhaus Eppendorf, West Germany.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Mar;97(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80050-2.
Three hundred and fifty bovine teeth were bonded with a ceramic bracket using nine different materials. Five of the materials were composites used in conservative dentistry, two were light-curing orthodontic adhesive test materials, and two were chemically curing adhesives. Four of the materials were modified by dilution with resin. With the proper consistency, it was found that the use of primer was not necessary. Adequate strength was observed within a 20-second curing time. No statistical difference in bond strength was observed among the materials. It is concluded that light-curing adhesives can offer several advantages in the bonding of ceramic brackets.
使用九种不同材料将350颗牛牙与陶瓷托槽粘结。其中五种材料是用于保守牙科的复合材料,两种是光固化正畸粘结剂测试材料,另外两种是化学固化粘结剂。四种材料通过用树脂稀释进行了改性。发现当具有适当稠度时,无需使用底漆。在20秒的固化时间内观察到足够的强度。各材料之间的粘结强度未观察到统计学差异。得出的结论是,光固化粘结剂在陶瓷托槽粘结方面可提供多种优势。