Laboratory of Vascular Investigations, University Hospital of Angers, France.
Microvasc Res. 2011 Nov;82(3):439-42. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
Laser Speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) allows non-contact, real-time recording of cutaneous blood flow (CBF). Different distances from laser-head to skin (distances(L-S)) can be chosen by the operator to perform these recordings. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different Distances(L-S) on the analysis of rest blood flow and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH).
Four distances(L-S) (10, 15, 20, and 30 cm) were evaluated in a random order in 11 healthy subjects. We analyzed the concordance between each recording at each distance(L-S). We compared CBF results (absolute values and cutaneous vascular conductance (CBF divided by mean arterial pressure)) obtained for each distance(L-S). The intra-subject coefficients of variation due to distances(L-S) (intra-CV, in%) were also studied.
The mean "r" (standard deviation) cross-correlation coefficient was 0.99 (0.00) between each CBF trace issued from different distance(L-S). Both kinds of CBF results, at rest and for PORH peak, show non-significant differences when the distance(L-S) is modified. The intra-CV varies from 5.9% to 8.6% at rest and from 5.6% to 9.1% for the PORH peak.
Distance(L-S) neither influences SBFR at rest, nor at peak post-occlusive hyperemia in the 10-30 cm interval using LSCI.
激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)允许非接触式、实时记录皮肤血流(CBF)。操作人员可以选择激光头到皮肤的不同距离(距离(L-S))来进行这些记录。我们旨在评估不同距离(L-S)对静息血流和闭塞后反应性充血(PORH)分析的影响。
在 11 名健康受试者中,随机评估了 4 个距离(L-S)(10、15、20 和 30 cm)。我们分析了每个距离(L-S)的每个记录之间的一致性。我们比较了每个距离(L-S)获得的 CBF 结果(绝对值和皮肤血管传导性(CBF 除以平均动脉压))。还研究了距离(L-S)引起的个体内变异系数(intra-CV,%)。
不同距离(L-S)发出的每条 CBF 轨迹之间的平均“r”(标准偏差)交叉相关系数为 0.99(0.00)。当距离(L-S)改变时,静息和 PORH 峰值时的两种 CBF 结果均无显著差异。静息时 intra-CV 从 5.9%到 8.6%变化,PORH 峰值时从 5.6%到 9.1%变化。
在 10-30 cm 间隔内使用 LSCI,距离(L-S)既不影响静息时的 SBFR,也不影响闭塞后高充血时的 SBFR。