UMR, origine, structure et évolution de la biodiversité, département systématique et évolution, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
C R Biol. 2011 Jul;334(7):544-54. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
Sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene have been shown to be useful for species identification in various groups of animals. However, the DNA barcoding approach has never been tested on African fruit bats of the family Pteropodidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera). In this study, the COI gene was sequenced from 120 bats collected in the Central African Republic and belonging to either Epomophorus gambianus or Micropteropus pusillus, two species easily diagnosed on the basis of morphological characters, such as body size, skull shape and palatal ridges. Two additional molecular markers were used for comparisons: the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the intron 7 of the nuclear β-fibrinogen (FGB) gene. Our results reveal an unexpected discordance between mitochondrial and nuclear genes. The nuclear FGB signal agrees with our morphological identifications, as the three alleles detected for E. gambianus are divergent from the fourteen alleles found for M. pusillus. By contrast, this taxonomic distinction is not recovered with the analyses of mitochondrial genes, which support rather a polyphyletic pattern for both species. The conflict between molecular markers is explained by multiple mtDNA introgression events from M. pusillus into E. gambianus or, alternatively, by incomplete lineage sorting of mtDNA haplotypes associated with positive selection on FGB alleles of M. pusillus. Our work shows the failure of DNA barcoding to discriminate between two morphologically distinct fruit bat species and highlights the importance of using both mitochondrial and nuclear markers for taxonomic identification.
线粒体细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚基 I(COI)基因序列已被证明可用于鉴定各种动物群体的物种。然而,DNA 条形码方法从未在翼手目 Pteropodidae 科的非洲果蝠中进行过测试。在这项研究中,从在中非共和国收集的 120 只蝙蝠中测序了 COI 基因,这些蝙蝠属于 Epomophorus gambianus 或 Micropteropus pusillus,这两种蝙蝠可以根据体型、头骨形状和腭嵴等形态特征轻松诊断。还使用了另外两个分子标记进行比较:完整的线粒体细胞色素 b 基因和核β-纤维蛋白原(FGB)基因的内含子 7。我们的结果揭示了线粒体和核基因之间出人意料的不匹配。核 FGB 信号与我们的形态学鉴定一致,因为检测到的 E. gambianus 的三个等位基因与 M. pusillus 的 14 个等位基因不同。相比之下,这种分类区别在基于线粒体基因的分析中没有得到恢复,而是支持这两个物种存在多系性模式。分子标记之间的冲突是由 M. pusillus 向 E. gambianus 的多次 mtDNA 渗入事件或与 M. pusillus 的 FGB 等位基因正选择相关的 mtDNA 单倍型不完全谱系分选解释的。我们的工作表明 DNA 条形码无法区分两种形态上明显不同的果蝠物种,并强调了使用线粒体和核标记进行分类鉴定的重要性。