• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类 Herbst 治疗后的牙颌骨变化——保持期结束后还剩下多少?

Dentoskeletal changes in adult Class II division 1 Herbst treatment--how much is left after the retention period?

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Schlangenzahl 14, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr087. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjr087
PMID:21785003
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess dentoskeletal changes following Herbst-Multibracket treatment in adult Class II division 1 patients. The subject material comprised 15 adult Class II division 1 subjects exhibiting a Class II molar relationship more than or equal to 0.5 cusps bilaterally or more than or equal to 1.0 cusps unilaterally and an overjet more than or equal to 6.0 mm. The average treatment time was 9 months (Herbst phase) plus 13.9 months (Multibracket phase). Lateral headfilms from before treatment (T1), after Herbst-Multibracket treatment (T2), and after at least 24 months of retention (T3) were analysed using the 'sagittal-occlusal analysis' (Pancherz, 1982) as well as standard cephalometric variables. During the treatment period (T2-T1), molar relationship, overjet (-6.2 mm), and overbite (-2.1 mm) were successfully corrected. The Class II jaw base relationship improved (ANB -0.8 degrees and Wits -1.1 mm) and the hard as well as soft tissue profile straightened (NApg +1.5 degrees, NsNoPgs +1.2 degrees, and NsSnPgs +1.5 degrees). During the retention period of on average 35.5 months (T3-T2), the amount of occlusal relapse (T3-T2) was small (less than or equal to 1.0 mm). The jaw base relationship (ANB +0.3 degrees and Wits +0.7 mm) and the profile convexities (NApg -0.3 degrees, NsNoPgs -0.6 degrees, and NsSnPgs +0.6 degrees) deteriorated slightly. Following the retention period, only minimal amounts of skeletal changes contributing to Class II correction in adult Herbst-Multibracket treatment were retained. Thus, adult Herbst-Multibracket treatment results in mainly dental changes, which however, showed good stability.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 Herbst-Multibracket 治疗成人安氏 II 类 1 分类错[牙合]患者的牙颌面变化。研究对象为 15 名成人安氏 II 类 1 分类错[牙合]患者,双侧或单侧存在至少 0.5 个牙尖的 II 类磨牙关系,且覆盖大于或等于 6.0mm。平均治疗时间为 Herbst 阶段 9 个月加上 Multibracket 阶段 13.9 个月。治疗前(T1)、 Herbst-Multibracket 治疗后(T2)和至少 24 个月保持后(T3)的侧位头颅侧位片采用“矢状-牙合面分析”(Pancherz,1982)以及标准的头影测量变量进行分析。在治疗期间(T2-T1),磨牙关系、覆盖减少(-6.2mm)和覆[牙合]减少(-2.1mm)得到成功纠正。II 类颌骨关系得到改善(ANB-0.8°,Wits-1.1mm),软硬组织侧貌变直(NApg+1.5°,NsNoPgs+1.2°,和 NsSnPgs+1.5°)。在平均 35.5 个月的保持期(T3-T2)中,牙[牙合]复发量较小(小于或等于 1.0mm)。颌骨关系(ANB+0.3°,Wits+0.7mm)和侧貌凸度(NApg-0.3°,NsNoPgs-0.6°,和 NsSnPgs+0.6°)略有恶化。保持期后,成人 Herbst-Multibracket 治疗中仅有少量的骨骼变化有助于 II 类错[牙合]的矫正。因此,成人 Herbst-Multibracket 治疗主要导致牙性变化,但具有良好的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Dentoskeletal changes in adult Class II division 1 Herbst treatment--how much is left after the retention period?成人安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类 Herbst 治疗后的牙颌骨变化——保持期结束后还剩下多少?
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr087. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
2
Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.Herbst/多托槽矫治器治疗成年早期和晚期安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形。一项对连续治疗患者的前瞻性头影测量研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Aug;28(4):352-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji116. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
3
Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.Herbst多托槽矫治器治疗期间的牙颌面效应:舌侧与唇侧矫治方法的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Oct;38(5):470-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv064. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.对使用延长疗程、强化、带环Herbst矫治器随后使用固定矫治器治疗的安氏II类1分类患者的头影测量研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020.
5
Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?II类2分类错颌畸形的治疗——骨骼成熟度会影响治疗效果和稳定性吗?
J Orofac Orthop. 2013 May;74(3):187-204. doi: 10.1007/s00056-013-0139-y. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.下颌后缩型和前突型面部患者接受Herbst治疗后的咬合稳定性:一项初步研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May;77(3):160-7. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance.成人安氏II类1分类错颌畸形治疗中的正颌外科手术与牙颌面正畸:下颌矢状劈开截骨术与Herbst矫治器的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):140-52; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.011.
8
Herbst plus Lingual versus Herbst plus Labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health.Herbst矫治器联合舌侧矫治与Herbst矫治器联合唇侧矫治:咬合效果与牙龈健康的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Oct;38(5):478-84. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw034. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.Herbst矫治器治疗期间II类错𬌗矫治机制与垂直颌骨基底关系的头影测量X线片研究
Angle Orthod. 1997;67(4):271-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0271:TMOCIC>2.3.CO;2.
10
The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions.Herbst矫治器/多托槽矫治器治疗安氏II类2分类错牙合时的切牙与唇的关系
Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):358-63. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0358:TILRIH>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Dentoskeletal changes of long-term oral appliance treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者长期口腔矫治器治疗的牙颌面变化:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;34(S1):62-79. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13946. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Comparative Analysis of Dentoskeletal Changes of the Twin Block Appliance and the AdvanSync2 Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class-II Malocclusion in Pakistani Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.巴基斯坦人群中 Twin Block 矫治器与 AdvanSync2 矫治器治疗骨性 II 类错牙合畸形时牙颌面变化的比较分析:一项随机临床试验
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):680-687. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739543. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Mandibular positioning techniques to improve sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives.
改善阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠质量的下颌定位技术:当前观点
Nat Sci Sleep. 2018 Feb 2;10:65-72. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S135760. eCollection 2018.
4
Mode of correction is related to treatment timing in Class II patients treated with the mandibular advancement locking unit (MALU) appliance.对于使用下颌前伸锁定装置(MALU矫治器)治疗的安氏II类患者,矫治方式与治疗时机相关。
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):363-370. doi: 10.2319/071316-549.1. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.下颌后缩型和前突型面部患者接受Herbst治疗后的咬合稳定性:一项初步研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May;77(3):160-7. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.II类固定功能矫治器治疗的稳定性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
7
Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.临时锚固装置的使用:瑞士正畸医生的一项调查
Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 1;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0029-x.
8
Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.使用Herbst矫治器治疗的成年患者面部侧貌吸引力的变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 May;75(3):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0210-3. Epub 2014 May 15.