Bock Niko C, Gnandt Erhard, Ruf Sabine
Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Private Practice, Darmstadt, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May;77(3):160-7. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare occlusal changes induced by Herbst treatment and the stability of these changes in patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types.
The sample comprised 11 retrognathic (SNA ≤76°, SNB ≤72°, ML/NSL ≥36°) and 10 prognathic (SNA ≥83°, SNB ≥80°, ML/NSL ≤32°) patients with Class II molar relationships of ≥0.5 cusp widths bilaterally or ≥1.0 cusp width unilaterally. Both groups involved similar distributions of skeletal maturity before treatment. Study parameters were assessed on casts reflecting the situations before treatment (T0), after Herbst treatment (T1), after multibracket treatment immediately following Herbst treatment (T2), and after a mean of 31.1 months of retention (T3).
Sagittal molar relationships improved by 0.8 cusp widths in the retrognathic and by 0.7 cusp widths in the prognathic group during active treatment (T0-T2). Insignificant changes of ≤0,2 cusp widths were seen in both groups during retention (T2-T3). Overjet decreased by 8.6 mm in the retrognathic and by 5.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, and both groups showed clinically irrelevant amounts of relapse by 0.7 mm during T2-T3. Overbite improved by 1.2 mm in the retrognathic and by 2.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, reaching mean values of 1.0 mm or 1.4 mm by T2, which was followed by 0.2 mm or 1.1 mm of relapse during T2-T3.
Treatment with a Herbst appliance seems to offer stable correction of the sagittal occlusal relationships in Class II patients with retrognathic or prognathic facial types, with the vertical changes being more pronounced in the prognathic cases.
本研究旨在评估和比较Herbst矫治器治疗引起的咬合变化,以及在凹面型和凸面型患者中这些变化的稳定性。
样本包括11例凹面型患者(SNA≤76°,SNB≤72°,ML/NSL≥36°)和10例凸面型患者(SNA≥83°,SNB≥80°,ML/NSL≤32°),双侧II类磨牙关系≥0.5个牙尖宽度或单侧≥1.0个牙尖宽度。两组在治疗前骨骼成熟度分布相似。研究参数在反映治疗前(T0)、Herbst矫治器治疗后(T1)、Herbst矫治器治疗后立即进行多托槽矫治后(T2)以及平均保持31.1个月后(T3)的模型上进行评估。
在积极治疗阶段(T0 - T2),凹面型组矢状面磨牙关系改善了0.8个牙尖宽度,凸面型组改善了0.7个牙尖宽度。在保持阶段(T2 - T3),两组均出现了≤0.2个牙尖宽度的微小变化。在T0 - T2阶段,凹面型组覆盖减小了8.6mm,凸面型组减小了5.5mm;在T2 - T3阶段,两组均出现了临床上无关紧要的0.7mm复发。在T0 - T2阶段,凹面型组覆合改善了1.2mm,凸面型组改善了2.5mm,到T2时分别达到1.0mm或1.4mm的平均值,随后在T2 - T3阶段出现了0.2mm或1.1mm的复发。
对于凹面型或凸面型的II类患者,使用Herbst矫治器进行治疗似乎能稳定地矫正矢状面咬合关系,垂直方向的变化在凸面型病例中更为明显。