Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Aug;197(2):W314-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6132.
The recent escalation in lower extremity revascularization procedures suggests a concomitant increase in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) screening. We hypothesized that self-referring physicians would show the greatest growth in noninvasive physiologic testing for PAD and similar trends for revascularization procedures. We compared utilization rates for self-referring specialties (vascular surgery, interventional radiology, and cardiology) with the utilization rate for a referral-based specialty (diagnostic radiology), assuming the latter to be "basal"--that is, responsive only to changes in demographics and medical knowledge.
We analyzed 100% procedure-specific claims for services provided to Medicare Part B beneficiaries during 6 years over an 8-year span (2000-2007). We extracted all Current Procedural Terminology codes for lower extremity vascular noninvasive physiologic studies, peripheral arterial stent placement, and transluminal angioplasty. Utilization volumes were adjusted per 100,000 beneficiaries. Compound annual growth rates were calculated.
Utilization of both noninvasive physiologic and revascularization services increased steadily over the study period. Growth rates of diagnostic services provided by interventional radiologists (7%) and vascular surgeons (8%) were slightly higher than the basal rate (7%), with cardiologists (14%) at the top of the list. For revascularization procedures, vascular surgery showed the greatest growth (28%), a rate more than twice that of cardiology (13%); radiology experienced a decrease in volumes (-2%).
Self-referring specialists are screening large volumes of Medicare beneficiaries for lower extremity PAD at an accelerated rate compared with testing done by those who do not self-refer. Similar trends exist for endovascular interventions.
下肢血运重建手术的近期增加表明周围动脉疾病(PAD)筛查也相应增加。我们假设,自行转诊的医生将对 PAD 的非侵入性生理检查显示出最大的增长,并且血管重建手术也有类似的趋势。我们将自行转诊的专科(血管外科、介入放射学和心脏病学)与基于转诊的专科(放射诊断学)的利用率进行了比较,假设后者是“基础”,即仅对人口统计学和医疗知识的变化做出反应。
我们分析了 8 年跨度内 6 年期间 Medicare 部分 B 受益人的 100%特定程序的索赔服务。我们提取了下肢血管非侵入性生理研究、外周动脉支架置入和经皮腔内血管成形术的所有当前操作术语(CPT)代码。利用量按每 10 万受益人的比例进行调整。计算了复合年增长率。
在研究期间,非侵入性生理和血管重建服务的利用率稳步上升。介入放射学家(7%)和血管外科医生(8%)提供的诊断服务的增长率略高于基础增长率(7%),而心脏病学家(14%)则位居榜首。对于血管重建手术,血管外科显示出最大的增长(28%),增长率是心脏病学的两倍多(13%);放射学的数量减少了(-2%)。
与非自行转诊者相比,自行转诊的专科医生以更快的速度对大量 Medicare 受益人的下肢 PAD 进行筛选。血管内介入治疗也存在类似的趋势。