Coen Jennifer R, Carpenter Annette M, Shupp Jeffrey W, Matt Sarah E, Shaw Jesse D, Flanagan Katherine E, Pavlovich Anna R, Jeng James C, Jordan Marion H
The Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C. 20010-2975, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):561-5. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31822ac7f9.
Little is known about the nutritional needs of obese burn patients. Given the impact of obesity on the morbidity and mortality of these patients, a uniform understanding of perceptions and practices is needed. To elucidate current practices of clinicians working with the obese burn population, the authors constructed a multidisciplinary survey designed to collect this information from practitioners in United States burn centers. An electronic approach was implemented to allow for ease of distribution and completion. A portable document format (pdf) letter was e-mailed to the members of the American Burn Association and then mailed separately to additional registered dietitians identified as working in burn centers. This letter contained a link to a 29-question survey on the SurveyMonkey.com server. Questions took the form of multiple choice and free text entry. Responses were received from physicians, mid-level practitioners, registered dietitians, and nurses. Seventy-five percent of respondents defined obesity as body mass index >30. The Harris-Benedict equation was identified as the most frequently used equation to calculate the caloric needs of burn patients (32%). Fifty-eight percent indicated that they alter their calculations for the obese patient by using adjusted body weight. Calculations for estimated protein needs varied among centers. The majority did not use hypocaloric formulas for obese patients (79%). Enteral nutrition was initiated within the first 24 hours for both obese and nonobese patients at most centers. Sixty-three percent suspend enteral nutrition during operative procedures for all patients. Oral feeding of obese patients was the most preferred route, with total parenteral nutrition being the least preferred. Longer length of stay, poor wound healing, poor graft take, and prolonged intubation were outcomes perceived to occur more in the obese burn population. In the absence of supporting research, clinicians are making adjustments to the nutritional care of obese burn patients. This indicates the need for further research to determine consistent best practices.
关于肥胖烧伤患者的营养需求,人们了解甚少。鉴于肥胖对这些患者发病率和死亡率的影响,需要对认知和实践形成统一的理解。为了阐明治疗肥胖烧伤人群的临床医生的当前实践,作者构建了一项多学科调查,旨在从美国烧伤中心的从业者那里收集这些信息。采用了电子方式以便于分发和完成。一份便携式文档格式(pdf)的信件通过电子邮件发送给美国烧伤协会的成员,然后分别邮寄给被确定在烧伤中心工作的其他注册营养师。这封信包含一个指向SurveyMonkey.com服务器上一份29个问题的调查问卷的链接。问题采用多项选择题和自由文本输入的形式。收到了医生、中级从业者、注册营养师和护士的回复。75%的受访者将肥胖定义为体重指数>30。哈里斯- Benedict方程被确定为计算烧伤患者热量需求时最常用的方程(32%)。58%的人表示他们会通过使用调整后的体重来改变对肥胖患者的计算。各中心对估计蛋白质需求的计算各不相同。大多数中心没有对肥胖患者使用低热量配方(79%)。大多数中心在肥胖和非肥胖患者的头24小时内都开始进行肠内营养。63%的人在所有患者的手术过程中暂停肠内营养。肥胖患者的口服喂养是最首选的途径,而全胃肠外营养是最不首选的。人们认为肥胖烧伤人群更常出现住院时间延长、伤口愈合不良、植皮成活率低和插管时间延长等情况。在缺乏支持性研究的情况下,临床医生正在对肥胖烧伤患者的营养护理进行调整。这表明需要进一步研究以确定一致的最佳实践。