Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1403-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1808-4. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
The growing number of cancer survivors combined with a looming shortage of oncology specialists will require greater coordination of post-treatment care responsibilities between oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs). However, data are limited regarding these physicians' views of cancer survivors' care.
To compare PCPs and oncologists with regard to their knowledge, attitudes, and practices for follow-up care of breast and colon cancer survivors.
Mailed questionnaires were completed by a nationally representative sample of 1,072 PCPs and 1,130 medical oncologists in 2009 (cooperation rate = 65%). Sampling and non-response weights were used to calculate estimates to reflect practicing US PCPs and oncologists.
PCPs and oncologists reported their 1) preferred model for delivering cancer survivors' care; 2) assessment of PCPs' ability to perform follow-up care tasks; 3) confidence in their knowledge; and 4) cancer surveillance practices.
Compared with PCPs, oncologists were less likely to believe PCPs had the skills to conduct appropriate testing for breast cancer recurrence (59% vs. 23%, P < 0.001) or to care for late effects of breast cancer (75% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). Only 40% of PCPs were very confident of their own knowledge of testing for recurrence. PCPs were more likely than oncologists to endorse routine use of non-recommended blood and imaging tests for detecting cancer recurrence, with both groups departing substantially from guideline recommendations.
There are significant differences in PCPs' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to care of cancer survivors. Improving cancer survivors' care may require more effective communication between these two groups to increase PCPs' confidence in their knowledge, and must also address oncologists' attitudes regarding PCPs' ability to care for cancer survivors.
癌症幸存者人数不断增加,而肿瘤学专家的短缺情况日益严重,这将需要肿瘤学家和初级保健医生(PCP)之间更大程度地协调治疗后的护理责任。但是,关于这些医生对癌症幸存者护理的看法的数据有限。
比较 PCP 和肿瘤学家在乳腺癌和结肠癌幸存者的随访护理方面的知识、态度和实践。
2009 年,通过邮寄问卷对全国代表性的 1072 名 PCP 和 1130 名肿瘤内科医生进行了调查(合作率为 65%)。使用抽样和无应答权重来计算估计值,以反映美国的实际 PCP 和肿瘤学家。
PCP 和肿瘤学家报告了他们的 1)为癌症幸存者提供护理的首选模式;2)评估 PCP 进行随访护理任务的能力;3)对自身知识的信心;以及 4)癌症监测实践。
与 PCP 相比,肿瘤学家更倾向于认为 PCP 具备进行适当的乳腺癌复发检测的技能(59%比 23%,P<0.001)或护理乳腺癌晚期效应的技能(75%比 38%,P<0.001)。只有 40%的 PCP 对自己的检测复发知识非常有信心。与肿瘤学家相比,PCP 更倾向于支持常规使用非推荐的血液和成像检查来检测癌症复发,这两组都与指南建议有很大的出入。
PCP 和肿瘤学家在癌症幸存者的护理方面存在显著的知识、态度和实践差异。为了提高癌症幸存者的护理质量,可能需要这两组之间进行更有效的沟通,以提高 PCP 对自身知识的信心,并且还必须解决肿瘤学家对 PCP 照顾癌症幸存者能力的态度问题。