• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复合性腹部污染创面缺损的组织分离治疗效果。

Outcome of components separation for contaminated complex abdominal wall defects.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, 4760 Sunset Boulevard, 3rd Floor, West Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2012 Feb;16(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0857-2. Epub 2011 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-011-0857-2
PMID:21786148
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contaminated large abdominal wall defects can pose a formidable challenge to the surgeon. This study compared the outcome of components separation (CS) for complex ventral defects with or without contamination.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent CS over an 8-year period. Pre-operative factors such as the presence/absence of contamination were analyzed for their effect on length of hospitalization, readmission rate, post-operative complications, re-intervention rate, and long-term recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients was analyzed. There were 18 males (53%) with a mean age of 57 years. Mean body mass index was 31 kg/m(2). Seventeen patients (50%) had prior repair (mean 2.1 repairs per patient, median 2). Mean size of abdominal defect was 255 cm(2). Out of the 34 patients, 13 had infected or contaminated defects, including 5 patients with infected mesh. Length of stay was longer in the contaminated group (11.1 vs 3.1 days, P < 0.01). A higher complication rate was noted in the setting of contamination (77 vs 38%, P = 0.03). During a mean follow-up of 47 months, no difference was noted in the re-intervention rate (38 vs 29%, P = 0.70) or long-term recurrence rate of the defect (8 vs 5%, P = 1.0) (contaminated vs non-contaminated group, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CS is a good option for closure of large contaminated complex abdominal wall defects. Despite an increased risk of postoperative complications and longer hospitalization length, long-term outcomes are favorable.

摘要

背景

污染的大腹壁缺损可能对外科医生构成巨大挑战。本研究比较了有或无污染的复杂性腹侧缺损的组件分离(CS)的结果。

方法

对 8 年内接受 CS 的所有患者进行回顾性分析。分析术前是否存在污染等因素对住院时间、再入院率、术后并发症、再次干预率和长期复发的影响。

结果

共分析了 34 例患者。其中男性 18 例(53%),平均年龄 57 岁。平均体重指数为 31 kg/m²。17 例(50%)患者有既往修复史(平均每位患者 2.1 次修复,中位数 2 次)。腹壁缺损的平均大小为 255 cm²。34 例患者中,13 例有感染或污染的缺损,其中 5 例有感染的网片。污染组的住院时间较长(11.1 天 vs. 3.1 天,P < 0.01)。在污染的情况下,并发症发生率更高(77% vs. 38%,P = 0.03)。在平均 47 个月的随访中,再干预率(38% vs. 29%,P = 0.70)或缺陷的长期复发率(8% vs. 5%,P = 1.0)(分别为污染组和非污染组)无差异。

结论

CS 是闭合大污染复杂腹壁缺损的良好选择。尽管术后并发症风险增加和住院时间延长,但长期结果是有利的。

相似文献

1
Outcome of components separation for contaminated complex abdominal wall defects.复合性腹部污染创面缺损的组织分离治疗效果。
Hernia. 2012 Feb;16(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0857-2. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
2
A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.利用生物补片进行一期修复感染和污染的腹壁缺损的 5 年临床经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):991-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182849871.
3
Single-stage abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated and dirty wounds is safe: a single center experience.一期腹壁重建在污染和脏污创面是安全的:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5766-5771. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09058-4. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
Active Staphylococcus aureus infection: Is it a contra-indication to the repair of complex hernias with synthetic mesh? A prospective observational study on the outcomes of synthetic mesh replacement, in patients with chronic mesh infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus.金黄色葡萄球菌活动性感染:它是使用合成补片修复复杂疝的禁忌症吗?一项关于金黄色葡萄球菌引起的慢性补片感染患者进行合成补片置换结局的前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.062. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction.污染性复杂腹壁重建术后的长期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02124-7. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
8
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
The Impact of Mesh Reinforcement with Components Separation for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.使用组织分离技术加补片加强修补术对腹壁重建的影响
Am Surg. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):959-962.
10
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.使用脱细胞真皮基质进行腹壁重建的结果不受伤口污染的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Modified Frailty 5-Factor Index Predicts Adverse Outcomes After Ventral Hernia Repair in a National Database.改良衰弱五因素指数在全国数据库中可预测腹疝修补术后的不良结局。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 13;13(1):e6411. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006411. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Is there a role for botulinum toxin A in the emergency setting for delayed abdominal wall closure in the management of the open abdomen? A systematic review.在开放性腹部处理中,肉毒杆菌毒素A在腹壁延迟关闭的紧急情况下是否起作用?一项系统评价。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Apr;105(4):306-313. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0284. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and risk factors for the development of incisional hernia following elective laparoscopic versus open colon resections.择期腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术后切口疝发生的发生率及危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Aug;200(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.044. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Operative management of massive hernias with associated distended bowel.巨大疝伴扩张肠管的手术治疗。
Am J Surg. 2010 Aug;200(2):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.040. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Component separation technique for abdominal wall reconstruction in burn patients with decompressive laparotomies.
The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines.
创伤和非创伤患者的开放性腹部:WSES 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Feb 2;13:7. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4. eCollection 2018.
4
The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.非创伤患者应用开放性腹部的作用:WSES 共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 14;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0146-1. eCollection 2017.
5
Modified components separation technique: experience treating large, complex ventral hernias at a University Hospital.改良式成分分离技术:在一家大学医院治疗大型复杂腹侧疝的经验
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1619-6. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.手术治疗大型切口疝的系统评价。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1321-x. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
8
Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜与开放成分分离术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3741-1. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
9
Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review.手术治疗巨大切口疝:定性系统评价。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):31-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1066-y. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
10
Evaluation of ultrasound for identification of abdominal wall myofascial components by novice learners.评估新手学习者通过超声识别腹壁筋膜组件。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1953-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2693-6. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
用于接受剖腹减压术的烧伤患者腹壁重建的成分分离技术
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1435-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b5f346.
4
Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 "components separation" procedures.腹壁重建:从200例“成分分离”手术中吸取的经验教训。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1047-55. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.192.
5
Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision.上腹部手术后切口疝:中线切口与横向切口的随机对照试验
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0469-7. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
6
Components separation: a solution to complex abdominal wall defects.成分分离:复杂腹壁缺损的一种解决方案。
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):912-6.
7
Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术修复切口疝/腹疝:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2009 Jan;197(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.051. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
8
Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes?脱细胞真皮基质在复杂腹疝修补术中的应用:技术是否会影响手术效果?
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Nov;205(5):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: "components separation technique" versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial.巨大中线腹壁疝修补术:“成分分离技术”与假体修补术的随机对照试验中期分析
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):756-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x.
10
Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions.人脱细胞真皮基质在复杂及污染腹壁重建中的应用。
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):360-3; discussion 363. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.021.