Garvey Patrick B, Martinez Roberto A, Baumann Donald P, Liu Jun, Butler Charles E
Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
The optimal type of mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction has not been elucidated. We hypothesized that AWRs using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) experience low rates of surgical site occurrence (SSO) and surgical site infection, despite increasing degrees of wound contamination.
We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive abdominal wall reconstructions with ADM over a 9-year period. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstructions were compared between patients with different CDC wound classifications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified potential associations and predictive/protective factors.
The 359 patients had a mean follow-up of 28.3 ± 19.0 months. Reconstruction of clean wounds (n = 171) required fewer reoperations than that of combined contaminated (n = 188) wounds (2.3% vs 11.2%; p = 0.001) and trended toward experiencing fewer SSOs (19.9% vs 28.7%, p = 0.052). There were no significant differences between clean and combined contaminated cases in 30-day SSI (8.8% vs 8.0%), hernia recurrence (9.9% vs 10.1%), and mesh removal (1.2% vs 1.1%) rates. Independent predictors of SSO included body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; p < 0.001), 1 or more comorbidities (OR 2.5; p = 0.008), and defect width ≥15 cm (OR 1.8; p = 0.02).
Complex abdominal wall reconstructions using ADM demonstrated similar rates of complications between the different CDC wound classifications. This is in contradistinction to published outcomes for abdominal wall reconstruction using synthetic mesh that show progressively higher complication rates with increasing degrees of contamination. These data support the use of ADM rather than synthetic mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of wound contamination.
用于复杂腹壁重建的最佳补片类型尚未明确。我们推测,尽管伤口污染程度不断增加,但使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)进行腹壁重建(AWR)的手术部位事件(SSO)和手术部位感染发生率较低。
我们回顾性分析了9年间连续使用ADM进行腹壁重建的前瞻性收集数据。比较了不同疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)伤口分类患者的腹壁重建结果。单因素和多因素逻辑回归以及Cox比例风险回归分析确定了潜在关联以及预测/保护因素。
359例患者的平均随访时间为28.3±19.0个月。清洁伤口(n = 171)重建所需的再次手术次数少于混合污染伤口(n = 188)(2.3%对11.2%;p = 0.001),且手术部位事件发生率有降低趋势(19.9%对28.7%,p = 0.052)。清洁伤口和混合污染伤口在30天手术部位感染(8.8%对8.0%)、疝复发(9.9%对10.1%)和补片移除(1.2%对1.1%)率方面无显著差异。手术部位事件的独立预测因素包括体重指数≥30 kg/m²(比值比[OR] 3.6;p < 0.001)、1种或更多合并症(OR 2.5;p = 0.008)以及缺损宽度≥15 cm(OR 1.8;p = 0.02)。
使用ADM进行复杂腹壁重建在不同CDC伤口分类之间显示出相似的并发症发生率。这与使用合成补片进行腹壁重建的已发表结果形成对比,后者显示随着污染程度增加并发症发生率逐渐升高。这些数据支持在伤口污染情况下使用ADM而非合成补片进行复杂腹壁重建。