Suppr超能文献

舍饲和放牧全混合日粮对泌乳奶牛行为及其在室内或牧场偏好的影响。

Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture.

机构信息

Animal Science Research Centre, Harper Adams University College, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):3875-84. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4172.

Abstract

Grazing is considered a normal behavior for dairy cattle, although they may not be able to meet their nutritional requirements from grazing alone, and so to sustain higher yields requires access to a total mixed ration (TMR). The study aim was to provide dairy cows with access to TMR indoors and on pasture to establish influence on behavior and preference for each location. The study took place from August to November, 2009, using 36 late-lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. The cows were allocated to 1 of 3 26-d study periods (n=12×3). Within each period the cows were further divided into a control (n=6) or treatment (n=6) group using a crossover design, where the cows were changed between the control and treatment group after 13 d. Treatment cows had access to TMR indoors and on pasture, whereas control cows only had access to TMR indoors. Following a.m. and p.m. milkings the cows were taken to a point equidistant between indoors and pasture and given the choice of going to pasture (1.5 ha) or to a freestall barn. Between milkings the cows had free access between the locations. Initial choice was recorded and a video camera was used to record time spent in each location. Behavior observations were recorded to establish how the cows spent their time during the day. To determine what factors influenced preference, weather conditions, milk yield, body condition score, and lameness were recorded. Initially, the cows chose indoors following milking (96.4±0.80%). Overall, the cows expressed a partial preference for pasture (71.1±1.82%), which was different from 100, 50, and 0%. Study period influenced preference with cows spending less time on pasture as the season progressed (86.7 vs. 68.3 vs. 58.3% for study periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Providing the cows with TMR outdoors did not affect pasture use, but resulted in an increase in TMR intake of 2.2±0.41 kg of dry matter/d. The cows spent more time on pasture as the temperature-humidity index indoors (55.6±0.92) and outdoors (54.6±0.82) increased, but rainfall and milk yield did not influence preference. Cows with lameness score >1.5 spent more time indoors (35.4±4.52 vs. 25.2±2.64% for cows with >1.5 vs. ≤1.5 lameness score, respectively). In conclusion, the cows expressed a partial preference for pasture, which was not influenced by providing TMR on pasture.

摘要

放牧被认为是奶牛的正常行为,尽管它们可能无法仅通过放牧来满足其营养需求,因此要维持更高的产量就需要摄入全混合日粮(TMR)。本研究的目的是为奶牛提供室内和牧场上的 TMR,以确定其对每个位置的行为和偏好的影响。本研究于 2009 年 8 月至 11 月进行,使用了 36 头泌乳后期荷斯坦-弗里森奶牛。将奶牛分为 3 个 26 天研究期的 1 组(n=12×3)。在每个时期内,奶牛进一步分为对照组(n=6)或处理组(n=6),使用交叉设计,在 13 天后将奶牛从对照组转换为处理组。处理组奶牛可以在室内和牧场上摄入 TMR,而对照组奶牛只能在室内摄入 TMR。早晚挤奶后,将奶牛带到室内和牧场均等距离的地点,并让它们选择去牧草地(1.5 公顷)或去自由站立牛舍。在挤奶之间,奶牛可以在这些地点之间自由活动。记录最初的选择,并使用摄像机记录在每个位置花费的时间。观察行为记录,以确定奶牛在白天如何度过时间。为了确定影响偏好的因素,记录了天气条件、产奶量、身体状况评分和跛足情况。最初,奶牛在挤奶后选择室内(96.4±0.80%)。总的来说,奶牛对牧草地表示出部分偏好(71.1±1.82%),与 100、50 和 0%不同。研究期也影响偏好,随着季节的进展,奶牛在牧草地上的时间减少(分别为研究期 1、2 和 3 的 86.7%、68.3%和 58.3%)。在户外提供 TMR 不会影响牧草地的使用,但会导致 TMR 摄入量增加 2.2±0.41 千克干物质/天。当室内(55.6±0.92)和室外(54.6±0.82)的温湿度指数增加时,奶牛在牧草地上的时间增加,但降雨量和产奶量不影响偏好。跛足评分>1.5 的奶牛在室内的时间更多(35.4±4.52%,对于跛足评分>1.5 与≤1.5 的奶牛分别为 25.2±2.64%)。总之,奶牛对牧草地表示出部分偏好,在牧草地上提供 TMR 并不会影响这种偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验