Gippsland Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):717-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.108381.
A short cut review was carried out to establish which intraosseous device is best for use in the prehospital environment. A total of 2100 papers were found using the reported search, of which 2 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that traditional manual intraosseous infusion devices have better success rates and faster insertion times compared with semi-automatic intraosseous infusion devices in the prehospital setting.
进行了一次简短的文献回顾,以确定在院前环境中哪种骨内器械最适合使用。使用报告的搜索共发现了 2100 篇论文,其中 2 篇论文提供了最佳证据来回答临床问题。这些最佳论文的作者、日期和出版国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局、结果以及研究局限性都列在表中。临床要点是,与半自动骨内输注装置相比,传统手动骨内输注装置在院前环境中的成功率更高,插入时间更快。