Suppr超能文献

循证急诊医学:来自曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳 BETs。在院前环境中哪种骨内装置最好?

Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Which intraosseous device is best in the prehospital setting?

机构信息

Gippsland Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):717-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.108381.

Abstract

A short cut review was carried out to establish which intraosseous device is best for use in the prehospital environment. A total of 2100 papers were found using the reported search, of which 2 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that traditional manual intraosseous infusion devices have better success rates and faster insertion times compared with semi-automatic intraosseous infusion devices in the prehospital setting.

摘要

进行了一次简短的文献回顾,以确定在院前环境中哪种骨内器械最适合使用。使用报告的搜索共发现了 2100 篇论文,其中 2 篇论文提供了最佳证据来回答临床问题。这些最佳论文的作者、日期和出版国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局、结果以及研究局限性都列在表中。临床要点是,与半自动骨内输注装置相比,传统手动骨内输注装置在院前环境中的成功率更高,插入时间更快。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验