Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Invest Radiol. 2012 Jan;47(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318229ff0d.
To prospectively analyze the correlation between quantitative parameters of perfusion derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in patients with malignant liver tumors.
Thirty patients (mean age: 59.4 ± 12.3 years) with primary malignant liver tumors or hepatic metastases of various origin underwent DCE-CT (4D spiral mode, scan range, 14.8 cm; 15 scans; cycle time, 3 seconds) and DCE-US (low mechanical index, <0.1, 2.4 mL microbubbles). DCE-CT and DCE-US images were evaluated by 2 radiologists regarding quantitative perfusion parameters including arterial liver perfusion (ALP), portal-venous perfusion (PVP), and total perfusion (P = ALP + PVP) from DCE-CT, as well as blood inflow velocity (B) and the normalized slope within the calculation range (CVan) from DCE-US.
Quantitative assessment was possible with DCE-CT in 12/30 (40%) patients before and in all patients after automated motion correction. With DCE-US, quantitative assessment could not be performed in 9/30 (30.0%) patients due to respiratory motion. Interreader agreements for quantitative perfusion analysis were good with DCE-CT (r = 0.640-0.892, each P < 0.001) and DCE-US (r = 0.761-0.909, each P < 0.001). Moderate significant correlations were found between the perfusion parameters from DCE-CT (P, ALP) and DCE-US (B, CVan) (r = 0.446-0.621, each P < 0.05). No significant correlations were found between PVP from CT and perfusion parameters from DCE-US (B, CVan; each P = nonsignificant).
Quantitative evaluation of DCE-CT data was feasible in all patients after automated motion correction, whereas DCE-US data could not be quantitatively evaluated in 30% of patients due to respiratory motion and lack of motion correction software. Quantitative arterial perfusion analysis showed moderate significant correlations for blood flow parameters among modalities.
前瞻性分析动态对比增强 CT(DCE-CT)和超声造影(DCE-US)定量参数与恶性肝肿瘤的相关性。
30 例(平均年龄:59.4±12.3 岁)肝恶性肿瘤或不同来源肝转移患者行 DCE-CT(4D 螺旋模式,扫描范围 14.8cm,共 15 期,周期时间 3s)和 DCE-US(低机械指数,<0.1,2.4ml 微泡)。2 名放射科医生对 DCE-CT 的动脉肝灌注(ALP)、门静脉灌注(PVP)和总灌注(P=ALP+PVP)以及 DCE-US 的血流速度(B)和计算范围内的归一化斜率(CVan)等定量灌注参数进行评估。
12/30(40%)例患者在自动运动校正前后,12/30(40%)例患者在自动运动校正后可行 DCE-CT 定量评估。由于呼吸运动,9/30(30.0%)例患者不能进行 DCE-US 定量评估。DCE-CT (r=0.640-0.892,P<0.001)和 DCE-US(r=0.761-0.909,P<0.001)定量灌注分析的读者间一致性良好。DCE-CT(P,ALP)和 DCE-US(B,CVan)之间的灌注参数具有中度显著相关性(r=0.446-0.621,P<0.05)。CT 中的 PVP 与 DCE-US 中的灌注参数(B,CVan)之间无显著相关性(P=无统计学意义)。
自动运动校正后,所有患者均可行 DCE-CT 数据的定量评估,而由于呼吸运动和缺乏运动校正软件,30%的患者无法对 DCE-US 数据进行定量评估。定量动脉灌注分析显示,各模态之间的血流参数具有中度显著相关性。