Suppr超能文献

2009 年晚期结直肠癌的治疗。

Medical treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in 2009.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2009 Sep;1(2):55-68. doi: 10.1177/1758834009343302.

Abstract

The treatment options currently available in the medical therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) appear to be an abundance of riches. The integration of oxaliplatin and irinotecan as conventional cytotoxic agents as well as bevacizumab and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, cetuximab and panitumumab, as novel targeted agents into standard medical therapy have improved median overall survival in metastatic CRC beyond 2 years. It cannot be overemphasized that these significant improvements in outcome of patients with CRC are closely linked to the number of active drugs available to treat this disease. The abundance of treatment options, however, comes with specific challenges for the practical management of palliative medical therapy in advanced CRC, in particular with regard to the utilization of targeted agents. In this context, bevacizumab has established itself as the standard component of first-line chemotherapy. It is of interest for clinical practice that so far no predictive marker for the activity of bevacizumab in metastatic CRC has been identified. The key questions surrounding the use of bevacizumab in the palliative setting are whether its continuation beyond tumor progression provides clinical benefit, and which patient group is at higher risk for bevacizumab-related toxicities. Cetuximab and panitumumab have demonstrated efficacy both in combination with chemotherapy or - in contrast to bevacizumab - as single agent. In unselected patients, the effect of both EGFR antibodies on time-related parameters, progression free survival and overall survival, is moderate at best with emphasis more on the induction of tumor responses in a select group of patients. Therefore, until recently, EGFR antibodies were mainly regarded as salvage therapy options, in particular, since there did not appear to be a loss of activity when used in later lines of therapy. The finding that CRC harboring KRAS (and BRAF) mutations are resistant to EGFR antibodies, has allowed us to enrich the patient population with CRC that have a chance to benefit from cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Biomarker-based treatment decisions are therefore now an integral part of clinical practice and trial design in CRC. In conclusion, targeted agents have become an integral part of medical therapy for advanced CRC. The challenge for current oncologic practice is to develop a rationale and biomarker-based treatment algorithm utilizing all potentially active agents as individualized therapy.

摘要

目前在晚期结直肠癌(CRC)的医学治疗中可用的治疗选择似乎非常丰富。奥沙利铂和伊立替康作为常规细胞毒性药物以及贝伐单抗和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗作为新型靶向药物整合到标准医学治疗中,使转移性 CRC 的中位总生存期超过 2 年。不能过分强调的是,CRC 患者的这些结果的显著改善与可用于治疗这种疾病的活性药物的数量密切相关。然而,大量的治疗选择为晚期 CRC 的姑息性医学治疗的实际管理带来了具体挑战,特别是在靶向药物的使用方面。在这种情况下,贝伐单抗已成为一线化疗的标准组成部分。有趣的是,迄今为止,尚未确定转移性 CRC 中贝伐单抗活性的预测标志物。在姑息治疗中使用贝伐单抗的关键问题是肿瘤进展后继续使用贝伐单抗是否能提供临床获益,以及哪个患者群体存在更高的贝伐单抗相关毒性风险。西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗已证明在与化疗联合使用或 - 与贝伐单抗相反 - 作为单一药物时均有效。在未经选择的患者中,两种 EGFR 抗体对时间相关参数、无进展生存期和总生存期的影响充其量只是在一组选择的患者中诱导肿瘤反应。因此,直到最近,EGFR 抗体主要被视为挽救治疗选择,特别是因为在后续治疗线中使用时似乎没有失去活性。发现 CRC 中存在 KRAS(和 BRAF)突变的 CRC 对 EGFR 抗体耐药,使我们能够使 CRC 患者人群受益于西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗治疗。因此,基于生物标志物的治疗决策现在是 CRC 临床实践和试验设计的一个组成部分。总之,靶向药物已成为晚期 CRC 医学治疗的重要组成部分。当前肿瘤学实践的挑战是制定基于合理理由和生物标志物的治疗算法,利用所有潜在的活性药物作为个体化治疗。

相似文献

1
Medical treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in 2009.2009 年晚期结直肠癌的治疗。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2009 Sep;1(2):55-68. doi: 10.1177/1758834009343302.
4
Integration of novel agents in the treatment of colorectal cancer.新型药物在结直肠癌治疗中的整合应用。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;54 Suppl 1:S32-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0884-0.
5

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验