• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在家族关联研究中,使用贝叶斯回归模型中的不确定性编码矩阵进行单体型特异性风险检测。

Using an uncertainty-coding matrix in Bayesian regression models for haplotype-specific risk detection in family association studies.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021890. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0021890
PMID:21789192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3137600/
Abstract

Haplotype association studies based on family genotype data can provide more biological information than single marker association studies. Difficulties arise, however, in the inference of haplotype phase determination and in haplotype transmission/non-transmission status. Incorporation of the uncertainty associated with haplotype inference into regression models requires special care. This task can get even more complicated when the genetic region contains a large number of haplotypes. To avoid the curse of dimensionality, we employ a clustering algorithm based on the evolutionary relationship among haplotypes and retain for regression analysis only the ancestral core haplotypes identified by it. To integrate the three sources of variation, phase ambiguity, transmission status and ancestral uncertainty, we propose an uncertainty-coding matrix which combines these three types of variability simultaneously. Next we evaluate haplotype risk with the use of such a matrix in a Bayesian conditional logistic regression model. Simulation studies and one application, a schizophrenia multiplex family study, are presented and the results are compared with those from other family based analysis tools such as FBAT. Our proposed method (Bayesian regression using uncertainty-coding matrix, BRUCM) is shown to perform better and the implementation in R is freely available.

摘要

基于家系基因型数据的单体型关联研究可以提供比单一标记关联研究更多的生物学信息。然而,在单体型相位确定和单体型传递/非传递状态的推断中会出现困难。将与单体型推断相关的不确定性纳入回归模型需要特别注意。当遗传区域包含大量单体型时,这项任务可能会变得更加复杂。为了避免维度灾难,我们采用了一种基于单体型进化关系的聚类算法,并仅保留通过该算法确定的祖先核心单体型进行回归分析。为了整合三种变异来源,即相位模糊性、传递状态和祖先不确定性,我们提出了一种不确定性编码矩阵,该矩阵可以同时结合这三种类型的变异性。接下来,我们使用这种矩阵在贝叶斯条件逻辑回归模型中评估单体型风险。我们进行了模拟研究和一个应用,即精神分裂症多重家系研究,并将结果与其他基于家系的分析工具(如 FBAT)的结果进行了比较。我们提出的方法(使用不确定性编码矩阵的贝叶斯回归,BRUCM)表现更好,其在 R 中的实现是免费提供的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/8f1f52fbd044/pone.0021890.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/ecbbd341d6d4/pone.0021890.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/2fb7c84625ae/pone.0021890.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/f98ada4ab8c6/pone.0021890.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/8f1f52fbd044/pone.0021890.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/ecbbd341d6d4/pone.0021890.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/2fb7c84625ae/pone.0021890.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/f98ada4ab8c6/pone.0021890.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afe7/3137600/8f1f52fbd044/pone.0021890.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Using an uncertainty-coding matrix in Bayesian regression models for haplotype-specific risk detection in family association studies.在家族关联研究中,使用贝叶斯回归模型中的不确定性编码矩阵进行单体型特异性风险检测。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021890. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
Detecting local haplotype sharing and haplotype association.检测局部单倍型共享和单倍型关联。
Genetics. 2014 Jul;197(3):823-38. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.164814. Epub 2014 May 8.
3
Combining an evolution-guided clustering algorithm and haplotype-based LRT in family association studies.在家族关联研究中结合基于进化指导的聚类算法和基于单体型的似然比检验。
BMC Genet. 2011 May 19;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-48.
4
Direct analysis of unphased SNP genotype data in population-based association studies via Bayesian partition modelling of haplotypes.在基于人群的关联研究中,通过单倍型的贝叶斯分区建模对未分型的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型数据进行直接分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;29(2):91-107. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20080.
5
Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.匹配关联研究中考虑单倍型不确定性:简单与灵活技术的比较。
Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;28(3):261-72. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20061.
6
Linkage disequilibrium assessment via log-linear modeling of SNP haplotype frequencies.通过单核苷酸多态性(SNP)单倍型频率的对数线性模型进行连锁不平衡评估。
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;25(2):106-14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10254.
7
Haplotype uncertainty in association studies.关联研究中的单倍型不确定性。
Genet Epidemiol. 2007 May;31(4):348-57. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20215.
8
Genetic association mapping via evolution-based clustering of haplotypes.通过基于进化的单倍型聚类进行基因关联图谱分析。
PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul;3(7):e111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030111.
9
A flexible Bayesian framework for modeling haplotype association with disease, allowing for dominance effects of the underlying causative variants.一种用于对单倍型与疾病关联进行建模的灵活贝叶斯框架,该框架考虑了潜在致病变异的显性效应。
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Oct;79(4):679-94. doi: 10.1086/508264. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
10
SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.候选基因区域中的单核苷酸多态性、单倍型及模型选择:多位点数据的简单分析
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;27(4):429-41. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20039.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistically efficient association analysis of quantitative traits with haplotypes and untyped SNPs in family studies.在家族研究中,对数量性状与单倍型和未分型 SNPs 的统计有效关联分析。
BMC Genet. 2020 Sep 7;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00902-x.
2
Using Hamming Distance as Information for SNP-Sets Clustering and Testing in Disease Association Studies.在疾病关联研究中,使用汉明距离作为单核苷酸多态性(SNP)集聚类和检验的信息。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0135918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135918. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining an evolution-guided clustering algorithm and haplotype-based LRT in family association studies.在家族关联研究中结合基于进化指导的聚类算法和基于单体型的似然比检验。
BMC Genet. 2011 May 19;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-48.
2
Bayesian variable selection using an adaptive powered correlation prior.使用自适应加权相关先验的贝叶斯变量选择
J Stat Plan Inference. 2009 Aug 1;139(8):2665-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.004.
3
Clustering by neurocognition for fine mapping of the schizophrenia susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p.
基于神经认知的聚类分析对染色体 6p 上精神分裂症易感基因座的精细定位
Genes Brain Behav. 2009 Nov;8(8):785-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00523.x. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
4
Generalized linear modeling with regularization for detecting common disease rare haplotype association.用于检测常见疾病罕见单倍型关联的带正则化的广义线性模型
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 May;33(4):308-16. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20382.
5
Genetic association analysis with FAMHAP: a major program update.使用FAMHAP进行基因关联分析:主要程序更新
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 1;25(1):134-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn581. Epub 2008 Nov 9.
6
Association mapping by generalized linear regression with density-based haplotype clustering.基于密度的单倍型聚类广义线性回归关联作图
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):16-26. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20352.
7
No association evidence between schizophrenia and dystrobrevin-binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) in Taiwanese families.在台湾家庭中,精神分裂症与肌萎缩蛋白结合蛋白1(DTNBP1)之间无关联证据。
Schizophr Res. 2007 Jul;93(1-3):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
8
Haplotype uncertainty in association studies.关联研究中的单倍型不确定性。
Genet Epidemiol. 2007 May;31(4):348-57. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20215.
9
WHAP: haplotype-based association analysis.WHAP:基于单倍型的关联分析。
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;23(2):255-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl580. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
10
Neurobiology of schizophrenia.精神分裂症的神经生物学
Neuron. 2006 Oct 5;52(1):139-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.015.