Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Jan;40(1):145-57. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9547-x.
This study validates the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for children (SPSRQ-C), using a Dutch sample of 1234 children between 6-13 years old. Factor analysis determined that a 4-factor and a 5-factor solution were best fitting, explaining 41% and 50% of the variance respectively. The 4-factor model was highly similar to the original SPSRQ factors found in adults (Punishment Sensitivity, Reward Responsivity, Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking, and Drive). The 5-factor model was similar to the 4-factor model, with the exception of a subdivision of the Punishment Sensitivity factor into a factor with 'social-fear' items and a factor with 'anxiety' items. To determine external validity, scores of three groups of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared on the EFA models: ADHD-only (n = 34), ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ADHD+ASD; n = 22), ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder (ADHD+ODD; n = 22). All ADHD groups scored higher than typical controls on Reward Responsivity and on the 'anxiety' factor (n = 75). The ADHD-only and ADHD+ODD group scored higher than other groups on Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking and Drive, while the ADHD+ASD group scored higher on Punishment Sensitivity. The findings emphasize the value of the SPSRQ-C to quickly and reliably assess a child's sensitivity to reinforcement, with the aim to provide individually-tailored behavioral interventions that utilize reward and reprimands.
本研究使用荷兰 1234 名 6-13 岁儿童的样本验证了儿童敏感性惩罚和敏感性奖励问卷(SPSRQ-C)。因子分析确定,4 因素和 5 因素解决方案是最佳拟合,分别解释 41%和 50%的方差。4 因素模型与成人中发现的原始 SPSRQ 因素高度相似(惩罚敏感性、奖励反应性、冲动/寻求乐趣和驱动力)。5 因素模型与 4 因素模型相似,除了将惩罚敏感性因素细分为一个包含“社交恐惧”项目的因素和一个包含“焦虑”项目的因素。为了确定外部有效性,将三组注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的分数与 EFA 模型进行比较:仅 ADHD(n=34)、ADHD 和自闭症谱系障碍(ADHD+ASD;n=22)、ADHD 和对立违抗性障碍(ADHD+ODD;n=22)。所有 ADHD 组在奖励反应性和“焦虑”因子上的得分均高于典型对照组(n=75)。ADHD 组和 ADHD+ODD 组在冲动/寻求乐趣和驱动力方面的得分高于其他组,而 ADHD+ASD 组在惩罚敏感性方面的得分更高。研究结果强调了 SPSRQ-C 的价值,它可以快速可靠地评估儿童对强化的敏感性,目的是提供针对个体的行为干预措施,利用奖励和惩罚。