Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的奖惩敏感性:验证儿童奖惩敏感性问卷(SPSRQ-C)。

Reward and punishment sensitivity in children with ADHD: validating the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for children (SPSRQ-C).

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Jan;40(1):145-57. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9547-x.

Abstract

This study validates the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for children (SPSRQ-C), using a Dutch sample of 1234 children between 6-13 years old. Factor analysis determined that a 4-factor and a 5-factor solution were best fitting, explaining 41% and 50% of the variance respectively. The 4-factor model was highly similar to the original SPSRQ factors found in adults (Punishment Sensitivity, Reward Responsivity, Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking, and Drive). The 5-factor model was similar to the 4-factor model, with the exception of a subdivision of the Punishment Sensitivity factor into a factor with 'social-fear' items and a factor with 'anxiety' items. To determine external validity, scores of three groups of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared on the EFA models: ADHD-only (n = 34), ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ADHD+ASD; n = 22), ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder (ADHD+ODD; n = 22). All ADHD groups scored higher than typical controls on Reward Responsivity and on the 'anxiety' factor (n = 75). The ADHD-only and ADHD+ODD group scored higher than other groups on Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking and Drive, while the ADHD+ASD group scored higher on Punishment Sensitivity. The findings emphasize the value of the SPSRQ-C to quickly and reliably assess a child's sensitivity to reinforcement, with the aim to provide individually-tailored behavioral interventions that utilize reward and reprimands.

摘要

本研究使用荷兰 1234 名 6-13 岁儿童的样本验证了儿童敏感性惩罚和敏感性奖励问卷(SPSRQ-C)。因子分析确定,4 因素和 5 因素解决方案是最佳拟合,分别解释 41%和 50%的方差。4 因素模型与成人中发现的原始 SPSRQ 因素高度相似(惩罚敏感性、奖励反应性、冲动/寻求乐趣和驱动力)。5 因素模型与 4 因素模型相似,除了将惩罚敏感性因素细分为一个包含“社交恐惧”项目的因素和一个包含“焦虑”项目的因素。为了确定外部有效性,将三组注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的分数与 EFA 模型进行比较:仅 ADHD(n=34)、ADHD 和自闭症谱系障碍(ADHD+ASD;n=22)、ADHD 和对立违抗性障碍(ADHD+ODD;n=22)。所有 ADHD 组在奖励反应性和“焦虑”因子上的得分均高于典型对照组(n=75)。ADHD 组和 ADHD+ODD 组在冲动/寻求乐趣和驱动力方面的得分高于其他组,而 ADHD+ASD 组在惩罚敏感性方面的得分更高。研究结果强调了 SPSRQ-C 的价值,它可以快速可靠地评估儿童对强化的敏感性,目的是提供针对个体的行为干预措施,利用奖励和惩罚。

相似文献

2
Reward and Punishment Sensitivity are Associated with Cross-disorder Traits.
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Apr;298:113795. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113795. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
[A study of temperament and personality in children diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)].
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 May 26.
7
Feedback-related negativity in children with two subtypes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099570. eCollection 2014.
8
Heightened sensitivity to reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa.
Int J Eat Disord. 2011 May;44(4):317-24. doi: 10.1002/eat.20815.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Reward and Punishment Sensitivity among Adolescents with Depression Varying in Manic Symptoms.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01331-z.
2
Sensation seeking and risk adjustment: the role of reward sensitivity in dynamic risky decisions.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb 7;19:1492312. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1492312. eCollection 2025.
3
The mediating effects of mobile phone use on ADHD and educational outcomes: a two-step Mendelian randomisation study.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 4;15:1424082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1424082. eCollection 2024.
6
Personality Traits in Relation to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome and ADHD Inattention in Two Samples of Children.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 May-Jun;53(3):460-472. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2316707. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Laboratory Assessment of BIS and BAS in Children.
J Res Pers. 2011 Apr 1;45(2):198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.005.
4
Impaired decision making in oppositional defiant disorder related to altered psychophysiological responses to reinforcement.
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug 15;68(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.037. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
6
What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence.
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jan;20(1):61-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp078.
7
The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Feb;13(2):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
9
A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 May;36(4):567-89. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
10
Research review: dopamine transfer deficit: a neurobiological theory of altered reinforcement mechanisms in ADHD.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;49(7):691-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01851.x. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验