Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011;14(5-7):270-91. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2011.578273.
Only a small proportion of the published research on endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC) directly examined effects on neuroendocrine processes. There is an expanding body of evidence that anthropogenic chemicals exert effects on neuroendocrine systems and that these changes might impact peripheral organ systems and physiological processes. Neuroendocrine disruption extends the concept of endocrine disruption to include the full breadth of integrative physiology (i.e., more than hormones are upset). Pollutants may also disrupt numerous other neurochemical pathways to affect an animal's capacity to reproduce, develop and grow, or deal with stress and other challenges. Several examples are presented in this review, from both vertebrates and invertebrates, illustrating that diverse environmental pollutants including pharmaceuticals, organochlorine pesticides, and industrial contaminants have the potential to disrupt neuroendocrine control mechanisms. While most investigations on EDC are carried out with vertebrate models, an attempt is also made to highlight the importance of research on invertebrate neuroendocrine disruption. The neurophysiology of many invertebrates is well described and many of their neurotransmitters are similar or identical to those in vertebrates; therefore, lessons learned from one group of organisms may help us understand potential adverse effects in others. This review argues for the adoption of systems biology and integrative physiology to address the effects of EDC. Effects of pulp and paper mill effluents on fish reproduction are a good example of where relatively narrow hypothesis testing strategies (e.g., whether or not pollutants are sex steroid mimics) have only partially solved a major problem in environmental biology. It is clear that a global, integrative physiological approach, including improved understanding of neuroendocrine control mechanisms, is warranted to fully understand the impacts of pulp and paper mill effluents. Neuroendocrine disruptors are defined as pollutants in the environment that are capable of acting as agonists/antagonists or modulators of the synthesis and/or metabolism of neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, or neurohormones, which subsequently alter diverse physiological, behavioral, or hormonal processes to affect an animal's capacity to reproduce, develop and grow, or deal with stress and other challenges. By adopting a definition of neuroendocrine disruption that encompasses both direct physiological targets and their indirect downstream effects, from the level of the individual to the ecosystem, a more comprehensive picture of the consequences of environmentally relevant EDC exposure may emerge.
只有一小部分关于内分泌干扰化学物质(EDC)的已发表研究直接检查了对神经内分泌过程的影响。越来越多的证据表明,人为化学物质对神经内分泌系统有影响,这些变化可能会影响外围器官系统和生理过程。神经内分泌干扰将内分泌干扰的概念扩展到包括综合生理学的全部范围(即,不仅是激素受到干扰)。污染物也可能破坏许多其他神经化学途径,从而影响动物的繁殖、发育和生长能力,或应对压力和其他挑战。本综述介绍了来自脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的几个例子,说明包括药物、有机氯农药和工业污染物在内的各种环境污染物有可能破坏神经内分泌控制机制。虽然大多数关于 EDC 的研究都是在脊椎动物模型中进行的,但也试图强调研究无脊椎动物神经内分泌干扰的重要性。许多无脊椎动物的神经生理学描述得很好,它们的许多神经递质与脊椎动物相似或相同;因此,从一组生物体中获得的经验教训可能有助于我们了解其他生物体可能产生的潜在不利影响。本综述主张采用系统生物学和综合生理学来解决 EDC 的影响。纸浆和造纸厂废水对鱼类繁殖的影响就是一个很好的例子,在这个例子中,相对狭隘的假设检验策略(例如,污染物是否是性激素类似物)仅部分解决了环境生物学中的一个主要问题。显然,需要采用全球性的综合生理学方法,包括更好地了解神经内分泌控制机制,以充分了解纸浆和造纸厂废水的影响。神经内分泌干扰物被定义为环境中的污染物,它们能够作为神经肽、神经递质或神经激素的合成和/或代谢的激动剂/拮抗剂或调节剂,从而改变各种生理、行为或激素过程,从而影响动物的繁殖、发育和生长能力,或应对压力和其他挑战。通过采用一种神经内分泌干扰的定义,该定义既包括直接的生理靶标,也包括其间接的下游效应,从个体水平到生态系统水平,都可以更全面地了解与环境相关的 EDC 暴露的后果。