Cardiovascular Center, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yonegahamadori, Kanagawa-ken, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.015. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence, electrophysiologic properties, and clinical implications of dissociated pulmonary vein (PV) activity after PV antrum isolation (PVAI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). One hundred seventy-three consecutive patients (61 ±10 years old, 141 men) with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation were analyzed. After identification of arrhythmogenic foci, PVAI was performed in all patients. Of the total 346 isolated ipsilateral PVs, 97 (28.0%) were silent, 35 (10.1%) demonstrated isolated ectopic beats, 209 (60.4%) demonstrated a regular ectopic rhythm, and 5 (1.4%) demonstrated fibrillatory activity. The culprit thoracic vein was identified in 77 patients (44.5%). After isolation of ipsilateral PVs, venous activity was observed in 68 (79.1%) and 178 (68.5%) PVs among the 86 PVs with AF triggers and 260 PVs without AF triggers, respectively (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute PV reconnections exposed by adenosine triphosphate between the 97 silent ipsilateral PVs and 209 ipsilateral PVs with dissociated PV activity after the PVAI (20.6% vs 19.1%, p = 0.78). After a mean follow-up of 48.7 ± 7.9 months there was no significant difference in rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after a single procedure between patients with and those without dissociated activity (62.1% vs 63.3%, p = 0.74, log-rank test). In conclusion, although dissociated PV activity appearing after PV isolation is an important electrophysiologic finding to prove bidirectional conduction block between the left atrium and the PV during the procedure, the clinical implications might be limited.
本研究旨在探讨阵发性心房颤动(AF)患者肺静脉(PV)隔离(PVAI)后分离性 PV 活动的发生率、电生理特性及其临床意义。分析了 173 例接受 AF 消融的药物难治性阵发性 AF 连续患者(61±10 岁,141 例男性)。在识别心律失常灶后,所有患者均行 PVAI。在总共 346 个隔离的同侧 PV 中,97 个(28.0%)为沉默性,35 个(10.1%)表现为孤立性异位搏动,209 个(60.4%)表现为规则性异位节律,5 个(1.4%)表现为纤颤性活动。在 77 例患者(44.5%)中识别出了罪魁祸首胸静脉。在隔离同侧 PV 后,在 86 个有 AF 触发的 PV 中,有 68 个(79.1%)和 178 个(68.5%)PV 观察到静脉活动,在 260 个无 AF 触发的 PV 中分别观察到 68 个(79.1%)和 178 个(68.5%)PV(p=0.06)。在 ATP 暴露的情况下,97 个沉默同侧 PV 和 209 个分离性同侧 PV 之间的急性 PV 再连接发生率无显著差异(20.6%比 19.1%,p=0.78)。平均随访 48.7±7.9 个月后,单次手术无房性快速心律失常的患者在有和无分离活动的患者之间无显著差异(62.1%比 63.3%,p=0.74,对数秩检验)。总之,尽管在 PV 隔离后出现的分离性 PV 活动是证明术间左心房与 PV 之间双向传导阻滞的重要电生理发现,但临床意义可能有限。