Shi Wen-Biao, Yang Lin-Jun, Hu Xin, Zhou Jian, Zhang Qiang, Shao Zhi-Ming
Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Surgical Oncology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101390. eCollection 2014.
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast cancer that is associated with a high incidence of regional lymph node metastases and a poor clinical outcome. However, the clinico-pathological features and prognostic factors of IMPC are not well understood.
A total of 188 IMPC cases and 1,289 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cases were included. The clinical features, breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and recurrence/metastasis-free survival (RFS) of the patients were compared between these two groups.
The IMPC patients exhibited more features of aggressive carcinoma than the IDC patients, including larger tumor size, higher tumor stage, a greater proportion of nodal involvement and an increased incidence of lymphovascular invasion. Patients with IMPC had lower 5-year BCSS and RFS rates (75.9% and 67.1%, respectively) than patients with IDC (89.5% and 84.5%, respectively). Compared to IDC patients, the patients with IMPC had a significantly higher percentage of stage III breast cancer (51.3% versus 21.7%). In a stage-matched Kaplan-Meier analysis, the patients with stage III IMPC had lower 5-year BCSS and RFS rates than patients with stage III IDC (BCSS, P = 0.004; RFS, P = 0.034). A multivariate analysis revealed that TNM stage was an independent prognostic factor for patients with IMPC. The proportion of cancers with a luminal-like subtype was significantly higher in IMPC than in IDC (P<0.001). However, after matching by molecular subtype, the patients with IMPC had significantly worse clinical outcomes than patients with IDC.
In Chinese women, IMPCs displayed more aggressive behaviors than IDCs, resulting in poorer clinical outcomes for patients with IMPC, regardless of a favorable molecular subtype. Our findings illustrate that the poorer survival of patients with IMPC might be due to an increased incidence and aggressiveness of tumors in TNM stage III.
乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌(IMPC)是一种罕见的乳腺癌亚型,与区域淋巴结转移的高发生率及不良临床结局相关。然而,IMPC的临床病理特征及预后因素尚未完全明确。
共纳入188例IMPC病例和1289例浸润性导管癌(IDC)病例。比较两组患者的临床特征、乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)及无复发/转移生存(RFS)情况。
与IDC患者相比,IMPC患者表现出更多侵袭性癌的特征,包括肿瘤体积更大、肿瘤分期更高、淋巴结受累比例更高及淋巴管侵犯发生率增加。IMPC患者的5年BCSS和RFS率(分别为75.9%和67.1%)低于IDC患者(分别为89.5%和84.5%)。与IDC患者相比,IMPC患者中III期乳腺癌的比例显著更高(51.3%对21.7%)。在分期匹配的Kaplan-Meier分析中,III期IMPC患者的5年BCSS和RFS率低于III期IDC患者(BCSS,P = 0.004;RFS,P = 0.034)。多因素分析显示,TNM分期是IMPC患者的独立预后因素。IMPC中管腔样亚型癌症的比例显著高于IDC(P<0.001)。然而,在按分子亚型匹配后,IMPC患者的临床结局仍显著差于IDC患者。
在中国女性中,IMPC比IDC表现出更具侵袭性的行为,导致IMPC患者的临床结局更差,无论分子亚型是否有利。我们的研究结果表明,IMPC患者较差的生存率可能归因于TNM III期肿瘤发生率增加及侵袭性增强。