Curiale M S, Klatt M J, Robison B J, Beck L T
Silliker Laboratories, Inc., Chicago Heights, IL 60411.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990 Jan-Feb;73(1):43-50.
A colorimetric enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for detection of Salmonella in foods has been compared to the AOAC colorimetric monoclonal EIA screening method (986.35, 15th ed.; 46.B21-46.B29, 14th ed.). The assays use the same monoclonal antibodies and have similar reactivity toward Salmonella. However, the new assay uses antibody-coated microtiter wells instead of coated magnetic beads to capture Salmonella antigens. Compared with the bead assay, the coated-well assay format requires significantly less time to complete, and was consistently able to detect lower levels of Salmonella in mixed culture. Compared to the standard AOAC culture method for food samples, the plate assay was as productive. No false negatives were obtained by the immunoassay; the false negative rate was 1.1% by the culture method. The rate of agreement between the 2 methods was 99.1%. The official final action bead assay method for Salmonella in foods, 986.35, and the same assay for use with low-moisture foods, 987.11, have been modified official first action to use antibody-coated microtiter strip-wells.
一种用于检测食品中沙门氏菌的比色酶免疫分析(EIA)方法已与美国官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)的比色单克隆EIA筛选方法(第15版986.35;第14版46.B21 - 46.B29)进行了比较。这些分析使用相同的单克隆抗体,并且对沙门氏菌具有相似的反应性。然而,新的分析使用包被抗体的微量滴定孔代替包被磁珠来捕获沙门氏菌抗原。与磁珠分析相比,包被孔分析形式完成所需时间显著更少,并且在混合培养中始终能够检测到更低水平的沙门氏菌。与用于食品样品的标准AOAC培养方法相比,平板分析同样有效。免疫分析未获得假阴性结果;培养方法的假阴性率为1.1%。两种方法之间的一致率为99.1%。食品中沙门氏菌的官方最终行动磁珠分析方法986.35以及用于低水分食品的相同分析方法987.11已被修改为官方首次行动,改为使用包被抗体的微量滴定条孔。