• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理、风险与以患者为中心的护理:临床伦理学家与风险管理之间的合作如何带来尊重患者的护理。

Ethics, risk, and patient-centered care: how collaboration between clinical ethicists and risk management leads to respectful patient care.

作者信息

Sine David M, Sharpe Virginia A

机构信息

National Center for Patient Safety, the Veterans Health Administration, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2011;31(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.20077.

DOI:10.1002/jhrm.20077
PMID:21793115
Abstract

Patient-centered care is driven in part by the ethical principle of autonomy and considers patients' cultural traditions, personal preferences, values, family situations, and lifestyles. Patient decision-making capacity, surrogate decision making with or in the absence of a patient's advance directive, and the right to refuse treatment are three patient-care issues that are central to the work done by both the risk manager and the clinical ethicist that have strong relevance to patient-centered care. This article discusses these three issues briefly and offers two challenging case studies involving patient-centered care that illustrate how a clinical ethics consultation may help to avert the escalation that can lead to a tort claim.

摘要

以患者为中心的护理部分是由自主伦理原则驱动的,并考虑患者的文化传统、个人偏好、价值观、家庭情况和生活方式。患者的决策能力、有无预先指示时的替代决策以及拒绝治疗的权利是风险管理者和临床伦理学家工作中的三个核心患者护理问题,与以患者为中心的护理密切相关。本文简要讨论这三个问题,并提供两个具有挑战性的以患者为中心的护理案例研究,说明临床伦理咨询如何有助于避免可能导致侵权索赔的纠纷升级。

相似文献

1
Ethics, risk, and patient-centered care: how collaboration between clinical ethicists and risk management leads to respectful patient care.伦理、风险与以患者为中心的护理:临床伦理学家与风险管理之间的合作如何带来尊重患者的护理。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2011;31(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.20077.
2
Patient values: the guide to medical decision making.患者价值观:医学决策的指南。
Clin Geriatr Med. 1998 Nov;14(4):813-29.
3
Beyond autonomy: diversifying end-of-life decision-making approaches to serve patients and families.超越自主权:使临终决策方法多样化以服务患者和家庭。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jun;53(6):1046-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53317.x.
4
[Problems of surrogate decision-making. 1st part--absence of mandatory directive for treatment].[替代决策的问题。第一部分——缺乏治疗的强制性指令]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2008;147(3):141-3.
5
Ethical issues in dysphagia: when patients refuse assessment or treatment.吞咽困难的伦理问题:当患者拒绝评估或治疗时。
Semin Speech Lang. 2003 Nov;24(4):285-99. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815578.
6
Clinical ethics and the quality initiative: a pilot study for the empirical evaluation of ethics case consultation.临床伦理与质量倡议:伦理案例咨询实证评估的一项试点研究
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):356-64. doi: 10.1177/1062860608316729.
7
The design and use of the bioethics consultation form.生物伦理咨询表的设计与使用
Theor Med. 1992 Mar;73(1):5-14.
8
Medical decision making for the incompetent patient.无行为能力患者的医疗决策
Health Prog. 1987 Dec;68(10):37-42.
9
Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians.临终时的文化多样性:家庭医生面临的问题与指南
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Feb 1;71(3):515-22.
10
Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care.医疗决策:家长式作风与以患者为中心(自主)的护理
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Dec;14(6):708-13. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328315a611.

引用本文的文献

1
Goal-oriented care for patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity in primary care: A scoping review and concept analysis.以目标为导向的慢性病或多病共存患者的初级保健护理:系统评价和概念分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0262843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262843. eCollection 2022.
2
Use of conditional medical orders to minimize moral, ethical, and legal risk in critical care.在重症监护中使用有条件的医疗指令,以最小化道德、伦理和法律风险。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2022 Jan;41(3):14-23. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21487. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.
通过将伦理维度纳入重大事件报告系统来提高患者安全。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8.
4
A strengths-based data capture model: mining data-driven and person-centered health assets.一种基于优势的数据捕获模型:挖掘数据驱动和以个人为中心的健康资产。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 24;1(1):11-14. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy015. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
Preferences to Patient-Centeredness in Pre-Service Speech and Hearing Sciences Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.职前言语与听力科学专业学生对以患者为中心的偏好:一项横断面研究。
J Audiol Otol. 2016 Sep;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.7874/jao.2016.20.2.73. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Not at All Effective: Differences in Views on the Causes of Prescription Non-adherence Between North Korean Defectors and Medical Providers in South Korea.完全无效:朝鲜脱北者与韩国医疗服务提供者对处方不依从原因的观点差异
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Jun;17(3):867-84. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0008-9.