Harvard Medical School, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
BMC Neurosci. 2011 Jul 27;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-73.
FMRI studies focus on sub-cortical effects of acupuncture stimuli. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in primary somatosensory (S1) activity over the course of different types of acupuncture stimulation. We used whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) to map S1 brain response during 15 minutes of electroacupuncture (EA) and acupressure (AP). We further assessed how brain response changed during the course of stimulation.
Evoked brain response to EA differed from AP in its temporal dynamics by showing clear contralateral M20/M30 peaks while the latter demonstrated temporal dispersion. Both EA and AP demonstrated significantly decreased response amplitudes following five minutes of stimulation. However, the latency of these decreases were earlier in EA (~30 ms post-stimulus) than AP (> 100 ms). Time-frequency responses demonstrated early onset, event related synchronization (ERS), within the gamma band at ~70-130 ms and the theta band at ~50-200 ms post-stimulus. A prolonged event related desynchronization (ERD) of alpha and beta power occurred at ~100-300 ms post-stimulus. There was decreased beta ERD at ~100-300 ms over the course of EA, but not AP.
Both EA and AP demonstrated conditioning of SI response. In conjunction with their subcortical effects on endogenous pain regulation, these therapies show potential for affecting S1 processing and possibly altering maladaptive neuroplasticity. Thus, further investigation in neuropathic populations is needed.
功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究集中于针刺刺激的皮质下效应。本研究旨在评估不同类型针刺刺激过程中初级体感(S1)活动的变化。我们使用全头脑磁图(MEG)来绘制 15 分钟电针(EA)和指压(AP)期间 S1 脑反应。我们进一步评估了刺激过程中大脑反应如何变化。
与 AP 相比,EA 诱发的大脑反应在时间动态上有所不同,表现为明显的对侧 M20/M30 峰,而后者表现出时间分散。两者在刺激 5 分钟后反应幅度均显著降低。然而,EA 的这些降低的潜伏期更早(刺激后约 30 毫秒),而 AP 的潜伏期较晚(> 100 毫秒)。时频响应显示,在刺激后约 70-130 毫秒和约 50-200 毫秒的γ和θ频段中,早期出现事件相关同步(ERS)。在刺激后约 100-300 毫秒出现持续的事件相关去同步(ERD),α和β频段的功率降低。在 EA 过程中,在约 100-300 毫秒时β频段的 ERD 减少,但在 AP 中没有。
EA 和 AP 均显示出 S1 反应的条件作用。结合它们对内源性疼痛调节的皮质下效应,这些治疗方法显示出影响 S1 处理并可能改变适应不良神经可塑性的潜力。因此,需要在神经病理性人群中进一步研究。