• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超快速阿片类药物脱毒疗法在美国军队烧伤伤员治疗中的应用。

Use of ultra rapid opioid detoxification in the treatment of US military burn casualties.

作者信息

Maani Christopher V, DeSocio Peter A, Jansen Richard K, Merrell Jason D, McGhee Laura L, Young Alan, Williams James F, Tyrell Katie, Jackson Bonnie A, Serio-Melvin Maria L, Blackbourne Lorne H, Renz Evan M

机构信息

United States Army Institute of Surgical Research and Burn Center at Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S114-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182219209.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182219209
PMID:21795869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this case series was to review the management of burn patients who requested ultrarapid opioid detoxification under anesthesia after extended duration of narcotic use for chronic pain related to burn injury.

METHODS

The treatment plan of six opioid-dependent burn patients was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of our detoxification practice to date. Demographic and clinical information was used to characterize the patient population served: age, burn size, injury severity, duration of narcotic use before detoxification intervention, and length of hospitalization stay. Daily narcotic consumption, in morphine equivalent units, was noted both before and after detoxification.

RESULTS

Six burn patients (average age, 31 years) underwent detoxification at the Burn Center during a hospitalization lasting between 1 day and 2 days. Average burn size was 38% total body surface area (range, 17-65); average Injury Severity Score was 30 (range, 25-38). Mean duration of narcotic use was 672 days (range, 239-1,156 days); average use of narcotics at time of detoxification was >200 units daily. Mean outpatient consumption for opioids after the intervention was minimal (<25 units/d). No complications were noted during any procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of ultrarapid opioid detoxification under anesthesia suggests that it is safe and effective for treating opioid addiction in military burn casualties when a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach is used. Safety and effectiveness to date validate current practice and supports incorporation into clinical practice guidelines. Further clinical research is warranted to identify those patients who may benefit most from detoxification and to determine the timing of such treatment.

摘要

背景

本病例系列的目的是回顾那些因烧伤相关慢性疼痛长期使用麻醉药品后要求在麻醉下进行超快速阿片类药物脱毒的烧伤患者的治疗情况。

方法

分析了6例阿片类药物依赖烧伤患者的治疗方案,以评估我们目前脱毒治疗的有效性。利用人口统计学和临床信息对患者群体进行特征描述:年龄、烧伤面积、损伤严重程度、脱毒干预前麻醉药品使用时长以及住院时间。记录脱毒前后以吗啡当量单位计算的每日麻醉药品消耗量。

结果

6例烧伤患者(平均年龄31岁)在烧伤中心住院1至2天期间接受了脱毒治疗。平均烧伤面积为体表面积的38%(范围为17%-65%);平均损伤严重程度评分为30分(范围为25-38分)。麻醉药品平均使用时长为672天(范围为239-1156天);脱毒时麻醉药品平均每日用量>200单位。干预后门诊阿片类药物平均消耗量极少(<25单位/天)。任何操作过程中均未出现并发症。

结论

麻醉下超快速阿片类药物脱毒的结果表明,当采用协调一致的多学科方法时,该方法对于治疗军事烧伤伤员的阿片类药物成瘾是安全有效的。目前的安全性和有效性验证了当前的做法,并支持将其纳入临床实践指南。有必要开展进一步的临床研究,以确定那些可能从脱毒中获益最大的患者,并确定此类治疗的时机。

相似文献

1
Use of ultra rapid opioid detoxification in the treatment of US military burn casualties.超快速阿片类药物脱毒疗法在美国军队烧伤伤员治疗中的应用。
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S114-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182219209.
2
Ultrarapid opioid detoxification of two children with congenital heart disease.
J Addict Dis. 2000;19(4):53-8. doi: 10.1300/J069v19n04_05.
3
Long range transport of war-related burn casualties.战争相关烧伤伤员的远距离转运。
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S136-44; discussion S144-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816086c9.
4
Alternative strategies of opiate detoxification: evaluation of the so-called ultra-rapid detoxification.阿片类药物脱毒的替代策略:对所谓超快速脱毒的评估。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1998 Nov;31(6):205-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979329.
5
The place of detoxification in treatment of opioid dependence.脱毒治疗在阿片类物质依赖治疗中的地位。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006 May;19(3):266-70. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000218596.54054.a1.
6
[Forced opioid detoxification under general anesthesia--a new challenge for anesthetists and intensive care physicians].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1999 May;34(5):261-8. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-188.
7
In-patient detoxification procedures, treatment retention, and post-treatment opiate use: comparison of lofexidine + naloxone, lofexidine + placebo, and methadone.住院戒毒程序、治疗留存率及治疗后阿片类药物使用情况:洛非西定+纳洛酮、洛非西定+安慰剂与美沙酮的比较
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Apr 17;88(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.020. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
8
Diagnosis, characterization, and 3-month outcome after detoxification of 39 patients with narcotic bowel syndrome.39 例阿片类药物相关肠病患者的诊断、特征描述及 3 个月随访结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;107(9):1426-40. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.142. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
9
Shortening anesthesia duration does not affect severity of withdrawal syndrome in patients undergoing ultra rapid opioid detoxification.缩短麻醉持续时间对接受超快速阿片类药物脱毒治疗的患者戒断综合征的严重程度没有影响。
Acta Med Iran. 2010 Jan-Feb;48(1):27-32.
10
Joint Theater Trauma System implementation of burn resuscitation guidelines improves outcomes in severely burned military casualties.联合战区创伤系统实施烧伤复苏指南可改善重度烧伤军事伤员的治疗效果。
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S146-51; discussion S151-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b44c.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施减少慢性非癌痛长期阿片类药物治疗的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 4;377:e066375. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066375.
2
Patient outcomes after opioid dose reduction among patients with chronic opioid therapy.慢性阿片类药物治疗患者减少阿片类药物剂量后的患者结局。
Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002298.
3
Multidisciplinary care for opioid dose reduction in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic realist review.
多学科团队合作减少慢性非癌痛患者阿片类药物用量:系统的现实主义综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0236419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236419. eCollection 2020.