Division of Infectious Diseases, Institution of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Oct;38(4):331-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
Controversy continues regarding whether the presence of meticillin resistance increases mortality risk in Staphylococcus aureus infections. In this study, we assessed the role of meticillin resistance in survival of patients with S. aureus infection included in the EPIC II point-prevalence study of infection in critically ill patients performed on 8 May 2007. Demographic, physiological, bacteriological and therapeutic data were collected for 13796 adult patients in 1265 participating Intensive Care Units (ICUs) from 75 countries on the study day. ICU and hospital outcomes were recorded. Characteristics of patients with meticillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections were compared. Co-morbidities, age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, site of infection, geographical region and MRSA/MSSA were entered into a multivariate model, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for ICU and hospital mortality rates were calculated. On the study day, 7087 (51%) of the 13796 patients were classified as infected. There were 494 patients with MRSA infections and 505 patients with MSSA infections. There were no significant differences between the two groups in use of mechanical ventilation or haemofiltration/haemodialysis. Cancer and chronic renal failure were more prevalent in MRSA than in MSSA patients. ICU mortality rates were 29.1% and 20.5%, respectively (P<0.01) and corresponding hospital mortality rates were 36.4% and 27.0% (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis of hospital mortality for MRSA infection showed an adjusted OR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.03-2.06) (P=0.03). In ICU patients, MRSA infection is therefore independently associated with an almost 50% higher likelihood of hospital death compared with MSSA infection.
关于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染是否会增加金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者的死亡率,争议仍在继续。在这项研究中,我们评估了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在 2007 年 5 月 8 日进行的重症监护患者感染 EPIC II 点患病率研究中纳入的金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者生存中的作用。为 75 个国家的 1265 个参与重症监护病房(ICU)的 13796 名成年患者收集了人口统计学、生理学、细菌学和治疗数据。记录了 ICU 和医院的结果。比较了耐甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染患者的特征。将合并症、年龄、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II、感染部位、地理位置和 MRSA/MSSA 纳入多变量模型,并计算 ICU 和医院死亡率的调整比值比(OR)[95%置信区间(CI)]。在研究日,13796 名患者中有 7087 名(51%)被归类为感染。有 494 名患者患有 MRSA 感染,505 名患者患有 MSSA 感染。两组在使用机械通气或血液滤过/血液透析方面没有显著差异。癌症和慢性肾功能衰竭在 MRSA 患者中更为常见。ICU 死亡率分别为 29.1%和 20.5%(P<0.01),相应的医院死亡率分别为 36.4%和 27.0%(P<0.01)。MRSA 感染的医院死亡率多变量分析显示,调整后的 OR 为 1.46(95%CI 1.03-2.06)(P=0.03)。在 ICU 患者中,与 MSSA 感染相比,MRSA 感染导致医院死亡的可能性几乎增加了 50%。