• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《刑法》中关于强制治疗规则的修订是否意味着对精神疾病罪犯判决的范式转变?]

[Does the amendment of the rules of Criminal Code referring to mandatory treatment mean paradigm change in the judgement of mentally ill criminals?].

作者信息

Kalapos Miklós Péter

机构信息

Elmeleti Biologiai Kutatocsoport, Budapest es Jozsefvarosi Egeszsegugyi Szolgalat, VIII. TAMASZ Gondozo, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Psychiatr Hung. 2011;26(3):188-95.

PMID:21799221
Abstract

Talking of the Act LXXX. of 2009, the amendment of the Act IV. of 1978 on Criminal Code, the author reviews the Hungarian history of the changes of regulations referring to mentally ill criminals. He discusses the treatment regulations referring to criminals identified as insane, too. From historical and legal philosophical points of view, those parts of the modification of Criminal Code are analyzed that deal with mandatory treatment and took effect in he May 2010. The changes are judged as paradigm changing in a negative course that represents a doubtful step from the direction of perpetrator based criminal law to criminal act based criminal law.

摘要

谈及2009年第80号法案,即对1978年第4号《刑法典》的修订案,作者回顾了匈牙利针对精神病罪犯的法规变更历史。他还讨论了针对被认定为精神错乱罪犯的治疗规定。从历史和法哲学角度,分析了2010年5月生效的《刑法典》修订案中涉及强制治疗的部分内容。这些变更被判定为在负面方向上的范式转变,代表着从以犯罪人为基础的刑法向以犯罪行为为基础的刑法转变的一个可疑步骤。

相似文献

1
[Does the amendment of the rules of Criminal Code referring to mandatory treatment mean paradigm change in the judgement of mentally ill criminals?].[《刑法》中关于强制治疗规则的修订是否意味着对精神疾病罪犯判决的范式转变?]
Psychiatr Hung. 2011;26(3):188-95.
2
Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.审判权利与精神药物:反对在审判期间对被告进行非自愿药物治疗的案例。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002;55(1):165-218.
3
[Psychiatry, forensic psychiatry and society].[精神病学、法医精神病学与社会]
Psychiatr Hung. 2014;29(1):75-89.
4
Dangerous mentally disordered criminals: unresolvable societal fear?危险的精神错乱罪犯:无法消除的社会恐惧?
J Forensic Sci. 1991 Jan;36(1):210-8.
5
Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas.英格兰和威尔士的无辩护能力:历史发展与当代困境
Med Sci Law. 2019 Jul;59(3):187-196. doi: 10.1177/0025802419856761. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
6
Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.对精神病人的残忍行为:第八修正案对废除精神错乱辩护的挑战。
Am Univ Law Rev. 2007 Jun;56(5):1281-328.
7
Psychiatrists, criminals, and the law: forensic psychiatry in Switzerland 1850-1950.精神科医生、罪犯和法律:1850-1950 年瑞士的法医精神病学。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.以色列法律中的民事拘押与刑事精神错乱抗辩
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Aug-Sep;31(4):308-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
9
[Law on observation of criminals in forensic psychiatry].[法医精神病学中对罪犯的观察法]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2009;111(12):1571-4.
10
Mental disorder and criminality in Canada.加拿大的精神障碍与犯罪。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 15.