• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Quantitative and qualitative research methods, can they coexist yet?].

作者信息

Hunt Elena, Lavoie Anne-Marise

机构信息

Université Laurentienne, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Rech Soins Infirm. 2011 Jun(105):25-30.

PMID:21800639
Abstract

Qualitative design is gaining ground in Nursing research. In spite of a relative progress however, the evidence based practice movement continues to dominate and to underline the exclusive value of quantitative design (particularly that of randomized clinical trials) for clinical decision making. In the actual context convenient to those in power making utilitarian decisions on one hand, and facing nursing criticism of the establishment in favor of qualitative research on the other hand, it is difficult to chose a practical and ethical path that values the nursing role within the health care system, keeping us committed to quality care and maintaining researcher's integrity. Both qualitative and quantitative methods have advantages and disadvantages, and clearly, none of them can, by itself, capture, describe and explain reality adequately. Therefore, a balance between the two methods is needed. Researchers bare responsibility to society and science, and they should opt for the appropriate design susceptible to answering the research question, not promote the design favored by the research funding distributors.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Quantitative and qualitative research methods, can they coexist yet?].
Rech Soins Infirm. 2011 Jun(105):25-30.
2
Addressing the threat of evidence-based practice to qualitative inquiry through increasing attention to quality: a discussion paper.通过更多关注质量应对循证实践对质性研究的威胁:一篇讨论论文
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Feb;45(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
3
Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials.提高姑息治疗干预措施的有效性:定性研究在增强随机对照试验证据方面的潜在作用。
Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;22(2):123-31. doi: 10.1177/0269216307087319.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
The significance of nurse supervisors' different ethical decision-making styles.护士管理者不同伦理决策风格的重要性。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Nov;14(8):637-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00710.x.
6
Qualitative versus quantitative methods in psychiatric research.精神病学研究中的定性与定量方法
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:49-62. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_3.
7
Utility of qualitative research findings in evidence-based public health practice.定性研究结果在循证公共卫生实践中的效用。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;23(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.230311.x.
8
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.
9
A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy.循证实践、护理研究与反思综述:消除等级差异
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01912.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
10
Evaluation of a model of nursing care for older patients using participatory action research in an acute medical ward.在急性内科病房中运用参与式行动研究对老年患者护理模式进行评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):588-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01371.x.