Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Surveillance and Field Investigations Branch, 1095 Willowdale Rd., MS-1808, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;126(4):540-51. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600410.
Firefighters regularly respond to hazardous situations that put them at risk for fatal occupational injuries. Traumatic occupational fatality surveillance is a foundation for understanding the problem and developing prevention strategies. We assessed four surveillance systems for their utility in characterizing firefighter fatalities and informing prevention measures.
We examined three population-based systems (the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and systems maintained by the United States Fire Administration and the National Fire Protection Association) and one case-based system (data collected through the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program). From each system, we selected traumatic fatalities among firefighters for 2003-2006. Then we compared case definitions, methods for case ascertainment, variables collected, and rate calculation methods.
Overall magnitude of fatalities differed among systems. The population-based systems were effective in characterizing the circumstances of traumatic firefighter fatalities. The case-based surveillance system was effective in formulating detailed prevention recommendations, which could not be made based on the population-based data alone. Methods for estimating risk were disparate and limited fatality rate comparisons between firefighters and other workers.
The systems included in this study contribute toward a greater understanding of firefighter fatalities. Areas of improvement for these systems should continue to be identified as they are used to direct research and prevention efforts.
消防员经常应对危险情况,使他们面临致命职业伤害的风险。创伤性职业死亡监测是了解问题和制定预防策略的基础。我们评估了四个监测系统在描述消防员死亡和为预防措施提供信息方面的效用。
我们检查了三个基于人群的系统(劳工统计局的致命职业伤害普查系统,以及美国消防管理局和国家消防协会维护的系统)和一个基于案例的系统(通过国家职业安全与健康研究所消防队员死亡调查和预防计划收集的数据)。从每个系统中,我们选择了 2003-2006 年间消防员的创伤性死亡案例。然后,我们比较了案例定义、案例确定方法、收集的变量和费率计算方法。
各系统间的总死亡人数存在差异。基于人群的系统有效地描述了创伤性消防员死亡的情况。基于案例的监测系统在制定详细的预防建议方面非常有效,这些建议仅基于人群数据是无法得出的。风险估计方法各不相同,且消防员与其他工人的死亡率比较有限。
本研究纳入的系统有助于更好地了解消防员的死亡情况。随着这些系统被用于指导研究和预防工作,应继续确定需要改进的领域。