Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College, London, UK.
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug;61(589):e513-25. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588493.
Early detection and management of dementia in primary care are difficult problems for practitioners. England's National Dementia Strategy 2009 seeks to improve these areas but there is limited evidence on how to achieve this most effectively.
This review aims to identify and appraise empirical studies of interventions designed to improve the performance of primary care practitioners in these areas.
A narrative review of primary-care based studies.
Publications up to February 2010 were identified by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, and bibliographies. The criterion for inclusion was that studies had to be of interventions aimed at improving detection or management of dementia in primary care. Exclusion criteria included studies in non-English publications, pharmacological interventions, and screening instrument studies. Quality was assessed using the PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scale.
Fifteen studies were identified, of which 11 were randomised controlled trials. Eight reported educational interventions, and seven trialled service redesign, either by changing the service pathway or by introducing case management. Educationally, only facilitated sessions and decision-support software improved GPs' diagnosis of dementia, as did trials of service-pathway modification. Some of the case-management trials showed improved stakeholder satisfaction, decreased symptoms, and care that was more concordant with guidelines.
The quality of the studies varied considerably. Educational interventions are effective when learners are able to set their own educational agenda. Although modifying the service pathway and using case management can assist in several aspects of dementia care, these would require the provision of extra resources, and their value is yet to be tested in different health systems.
在初级保健中早期发现和管理痴呆症是从业者面临的难题。2009 年英国国家痴呆症战略旨在改善这些方面,但对于如何最有效地实现这一目标,证据有限。
本综述旨在确定和评估旨在提高初级保健从业者在这些领域的表现的干预措施的实证研究,并对其进行评价。
基于初级保健的研究的叙述性综述。
通过搜索电子数据库 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 以及参考文献,确定截至 2010 年 2 月的出版物。纳入标准是研究必须针对改善初级保健中痴呆症的检测或管理的干预措施。排除标准包括非英文出版物、药物干预和筛查工具研究。使用 PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库)量表评估质量。
确定了 15 项研究,其中 11 项为随机对照试验。八项报告了教育干预,七项试验了服务重新设计,要么改变服务途径,要么引入病例管理。在教育方面,只有促进会议和决策支持软件改善了全科医生对痴呆症的诊断,而服务途径改变的试验也是如此。一些病例管理试验显示患者满意度提高、症状减轻、护理更符合指南。
研究的质量差异很大。当学习者能够设定自己的教育议程时,教育干预是有效的。虽然改变服务途径和使用病例管理可以在痴呆症护理的几个方面提供帮助,但这需要提供额外的资源,并且其价值尚未在不同的卫生系统中进行测试。